...humm, I had my Queen's English corrected by a Dutch fellow while
stationed for a tour in Den Haag (The Hague), The Netherlands.
Unfortunately and in spite of my being a native-born speaker of the language
(or perhaps more correctly, an American Southern variant of it) the Dutchman
was correct...
Ernest Blair
Sr. Modeling & Simulation Eng. - Operations Research
Future Combat Systems, Lead Systems Integration Team, Manned Ground Vehicles
- SAIC, 4110 Campus Point Ct, M/S E3-X, San Diego, CA 92121
______________________________________
tel: 858-826-5138 fax: 858-826-5129
[log in to unmask]
-----Original Message-----
From: Fortran 90 List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
Hargraves Gary
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 2:19 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: F2003 has been published
This sort of thing is symptomatic of a wider malaise in all ISO/Brussels
activities and thinking, IMHO. Belgium must be too close and inherited the
worst aspects of Germany - or perhaps its that they aspire to be Hercule
Piorot (a belgian detective character by an English novelist).
You know, the only time I was insulted in Europe for attempting to speak
French was in Belgium. Of course, I was insulted in perfect English - and
being Australian I could recognise that ;). I think you can see where this
craziness is going: the Belgians simply want to 'out-English the English' in
formality.
Off topic ... you bet ... relevant, you be the judge.
Best regards
Gaz
-----Original Message-----
From: Fortran 90 List [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf
Of Richard E Maine
Sent: Wednesday, 1 December 2004 2:34 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: F2003 has been published
On Nov 30, 2004, at 4:21 AM, John Reid wrote:
> The failure to communicate with me or Richard Maine is extremely
> annoying. Many
> thanks, David, for telling me about it.
Yep. My guess was correct - that I'd first hear about it when someone
happened to notice it in an ISO catalog. In fact, I first heard in
comp.lang.fortran. I saw Dan's post there (citing John) about a minute
before I saw John's email to this list.
Now to figure out exactly what the standard looks like (since they
haven't told me) so that I can make a base document for committee work
that actually matches it. Not that the proposed changes were
significant (as I'm sure you know, John - in fact none of them actually
change a single word of text), but I'd still like to have the internal
base document "right" (meaning that it matches the published one), or
at least as close to it as practical.
(And then I'll be free to update the OS on the box I was building the
drafts on. For a while I've been in a strict configuration control mode
of not changing anything at all until the standard was published.
Didn't want to find that a version update of some software involved
caused undesirable changes that didn't get noticed because it was so
last-minute.)
--
Richard Maine | Good judgment comes from experience;
[log in to unmask] | experience comes from bad judgment.
| -- Mark Twain
************************************************************************
The information in this e-mail together with any attachments is
intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed
and may contain confidential and/or privileged material.
Any form of review, disclosure, modification, distribution
and/or publication of this e-mail message is prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, you are asked to
inform the sender as quickly as possible and delete this message
and any copies of this message from your computer and/or your
computer system network.
************************************************************************
