 |
 |
> How would that work? Wouldn't it presuppose an application > that knows which equivalent to prefer? There's no danger an > application would throw out "official" information in favor > of the old and out-of-date? Duplicates are repreated identic statements > > Are you saying that putting redundant information around > in various schemas is safe and practical -- the best of > the options above? One anyway will want to know, who is asserting what. Redundancy is what the net is very good for. rs > > Tom > > -- > Dr. Thomas Baker [log in to unmask] > Institutszentrum Schloss Birlinghoven mobile +49-160-9664-2129 > Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft work +49-30-8109-9027 > 53754 Sankt Augustin, Germany fax +49-2241-144-2352 > Personal email: [log in to unmask] > >