Print

Print


> From [log in to unmask] Wed Sep 10 13:11 MET 2003
> X-RAL-MFrom: <[log in to unmask]>
> X-RAL-Connect: <munin.lub.lu.se [130.235.140.140]>
> X-Authentication-Warning: bourree.lub.lu.se: sigge owned process doing -bs
> X-X-Sender: [log in to unmask]
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Date:         Wed, 10 Sep 2003 13:01:48 +0200
> From: No Name <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: record boundaries
> To: [log in to unmask]
> X-Spam-Report: -2.9/5.0
>       ------------- Start der SpamAssassin Auswertung ---------------
>       Diese Mail ist wahrscheinlich Spam. Die Orginal-Nachricht wurde
>       geaendert, so das Sie aehnliche Mails in der Zukunft besser
>       erkennen und blockieren koennen.
>       Weitere Details finden Sie unter der URL http://spamassassin.org/tag/.
>       Details der Inhaltsanalyse: (-2.90 Punkte, 5 benoetigt)
>       REFERENCES         (-0.5 points) Has a valid-looking References header
>       USER_AGENT_PINE    (0.0 points)  Message-Id indicates a non-spam MUA (Pine)
>       IN_REP_TO          (-0.5 points) 'In-Reply-To' Zeile gefunden
>       X_AUTH_WARNING     (-0.4 points) Has a X-Authentication-Warning header
>       EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION  (-0.5 points) BODY: Contains what looks like an email attribution
>       QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT  (-0.5 points) BODY: Contains what looks like a quoted email text
>       REPLY_WITH_QUOTES  (-0.5 points) Reply with quoted text
>       ---------------- Ende der SpamAssassin Auswertung -----------------
>
> On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Pete Johnston wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > I've never used RDF reification in practice (and I suspect that there
> > are subtleties I haven't grasped until I try!), but my reading of it is
> > that it might be an appropriate mechanism for recording that metadata.
>
> Buy a new harddisk before you do that experiment. The number of triples in
> your store will soon reach a critical mass, with a thermonuclear
> triplosion as a consequence ;-)


you really literally use a triple store for retrieval?


>
> Sigge
>
>