> From [log in to unmask] Wed Sep 10 13:11 MET 2003 > X-RAL-MFrom: <[log in to unmask]> > X-RAL-Connect: <munin.lub.lu.se [130.235.140.140]> > X-Authentication-Warning: bourree.lub.lu.se: sigge owned process doing -bs > X-X-Sender: [log in to unmask] > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 13:01:48 +0200 > From: No Name <[log in to unmask]> > Subject: Re: record boundaries > To: [log in to unmask] > X-Spam-Report: -2.9/5.0 > ------------- Start der SpamAssassin Auswertung --------------- > Diese Mail ist wahrscheinlich Spam. Die Orginal-Nachricht wurde > geaendert, so das Sie aehnliche Mails in der Zukunft besser > erkennen und blockieren koennen. > Weitere Details finden Sie unter der URL http://spamassassin.org/tag/. > Details der Inhaltsanalyse: (-2.90 Punkte, 5 benoetigt) > REFERENCES (-0.5 points) Has a valid-looking References header > USER_AGENT_PINE (0.0 points) Message-Id indicates a non-spam MUA (Pine) > IN_REP_TO (-0.5 points) 'In-Reply-To' Zeile gefunden > X_AUTH_WARNING (-0.4 points) Has a X-Authentication-Warning header > EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION (-0.5 points) BODY: Contains what looks like an email attribution > QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT (-0.5 points) BODY: Contains what looks like a quoted email text > REPLY_WITH_QUOTES (-0.5 points) Reply with quoted text > ---------------- Ende der SpamAssassin Auswertung ----------------- > > On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Pete Johnston wrote: > > ... > > > I've never used RDF reification in practice (and I suspect that there > > are subtleties I haven't grasped until I try!), but my reading of it is > > that it might be an appropriate mechanism for recording that metadata. > > Buy a new harddisk before you do that experiment. The number of triples in > your store will soon reach a critical mass, with a thermonuclear > triplosion as a consequence ;-) you really literally use a triple store for retrieval? > > Sigge > >