 |
 |
> From: DCMI Architecture Group [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On > Behalf Of Andy Powell > Sent: 15 January 2003 13:56 > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: rdfs:isDefinedBy revisited [snip] > How do we do that it a way that makes it clear whether it is one of the > abstract namespaces or the RDFS document that is being described? The following is a mail I sent to RDF-IG about an idea of how to help deal with this. Since the subject came up here I'll mention it here to. Comments on it should probably go to RDF-IG or myself though: -----Original Message----- From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Jon Hanna Sent: 20 January 2003 17:04 To: rdf-interest Subject: Resource and Representation Relationship Vocabulary Okay this is in a *very* early stage. But I wonder what people think of the idea of the schema at http://www.spin.ie/jon/rep/rep.xml? Summary: Define relationships between resources and representations, allowing the two to be better described and preventing the descriptions of each being muddled. As an aside this document shows another way of combining RDF and HTML, as well as answering "what can RDF/XML do that n3 can't?" as it is an RDF/XML document with an XSL transform producing the HTML. I'll have a plain HTML version up soon for anyone who can't read this one.I'll have a plain HTML version up soon for anyone who can't read this one.