 |
 |
One of the most notorious cases in this regard has to be Alex DaLarge in "A Clockwork Orange" (1971). In fact, there isn't even an agreement as to whether one is actually enjoined to regard this monstrous personality as sympathetic or even truly deviant, for that matter. Many people dislike this film intensely for just this reason, it seems to me. I find it to be one of its most salient strengths. The problem, I think, is that the case is one that elicits a high degree of ambivalence. We (might) sympathize with Alex's "mishandling" at the hands of scientists of questionable legitimacy because his overall guilt or innocence is, arguably, not a relevant factor in deciding whether such manipulation is justifiable, an argument which, of course, obviates the traditional Judeo-Christian attitude about the legitimate consequences of punishable behavior. As a result, Alex, despite his highly disagreeable qualities, becomes an Everyman that in some sense transcends the traditional conceptions of good and evil that might be taken to undergird the film's conceptual thrust. David Westling