Print

Print


Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]>
Received: from  rly-xe02.mx.aol.com (rly-xe02.mail.aol.com [172.20.105.194]) by air-xe03.mail.aol.com (v94.1) with ESMTP id MAILINXE33-3b5d3f02c917163; Wed, 02 Jul 2003 07:59:19 -0400
Received: from  angelo.kcl.ac.uk (angelo.kcl.ac.uk [137.73.66.5]) by rly-xe02.mx.aol.com (v94.27) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINXE24-4143f02c8ea3c6; Wed, 02 Jul 2003 07:58:34 -0400
Received:  from smtp.jiscmail.ac.uk (smtp.jiscmail.ac.uk [130.246.192.48])
        by angelo.kcl.ac.uk  with ESMTP id h62BwUJT000612;
        Wed, 2 Jul 2003 12:58:30 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LISTSERV.JISCMAIL.AC.UK (jiscmail.ac.uk) by smtp.jiscmail.ac.uk (LSMTP for Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id <[log in to unmask]>; Wed, 2 Jul 2003 12:58:29 +0100
Received: from JISCMAIL.AC.UK by JISCMAIL.AC.UK (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e)
          with spool id 23926165 for [log in to unmask]; Wed, 2 Jul 2003
          12:58:25 +0100
Received: from 130.246.135.159 by JISCMAIL.AC.UK (SMTPL release 1.0i) with TCP;
          Wed, 2 Jul 2003 12:58:25 +0100
X-RAL-MFrom: <[log in to unmask]>
X-RAL-Connect: <mercury.open.ac.uk [137.108.128.150]>
Received: from mercury.open.ac.uk (mercury.open.ac.uk [137.108.128.150]) by
          dori.rl.ac.uk (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id h62BwIc13106 for
          <[log in to unmask]>; Wed, 2 Jul 2003 12:58:18 +0100
Received: from creed.open.ac.uk by mercury.open.ac.uk via SMTP Local (Mailer
          3.1) with ESMTP; Wed, 2 Jul 2003 12:57:53 +0100
Received: by creed.open.ac.uk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id
          <MW00CV8K>; Wed, 2 Jul 2003 12:57:54 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
              boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C34091.23CB7E64"
Approved-By:  "T.Cashen" <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:  <[log in to unmask]>
Date:         Wed, 2 Jul 2003 12:57:41 +0100
Reply-To: "Chart: computers and the history of art" <[log in to unmask]>
Sender: "Chart: computers and the history of art" <[log in to unmask]>
From: "T.Cashen" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: "Curating Digital Art" panel event
To: [log in to unmask]
Precedence: list
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean


------_=_NextPart_001_01C34091.23CB7E64
Content-Type: text/plain

"Curating Digital Art" panel event
Tuesday July 8th, 2-4pm
Commonwealth Institute, London
Admission Free

In recent years, digital art has presented an increasing curatorial
challenge to art institutions. Digital art practice often suggests an
emphasis upon systems rather than objects, remote rather than local events,
and privileges reproduction over authenticity. Significant galleries such as
the Walker Art Centre, ICA, Whitney Museum of Art and Tate Modern have all
tackled the issue of institutional support of digital art, with varying
degrees of success.

This panel brings together a range of curators involved in the definition of
contemporary digital art. They will discuss a range of questions, including:

*Can digital art be considered within a larger visual arts framework, or
should it be considered as a separate discipline?

*What are appropriate means for presenting digital art -- are galleries
valid display systems for it, or is a process-based residency model more
successful?

*What are the specific aesthetic challenges of digital art and are the
various institutional frameworks addressing these challenges?

*Who is shaping these new models of artistic production? Are certain
experimental art practices not being represented because of their means of
production?

*How representative is the digital art that gets shown in galleries of the
scope of actual digital art practice?

Panel members: Charlie Gere (chair), Helen Sloan, Honor Harger, Walter van
der Cruijsen, Beryl Graham

The panel is part of Plug-in 03, annual degree show of the London College of
Music and Media, a Faculty of Thames Valley University (TVU)

For further details and map, see http://www.tvu.ac.uk/plug-in03/prog3.html
<http://www.tvu.ac.uk/plug-in03/prog3.html>
or contact James Coupe, Lecturer in Digital Art: [log in to unmask]


------_=_NextPart_001_01C34091.23CB7E64
Content-Type: text/html
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; charset=3Dus-ascii">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version 5.5.2653.12">
<TITLE>&quot;Curating Digital Art&quot; panel event</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Courier New">&quot;Curating Digital Art&quot; pane=
l event</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Courier New">Tuesday July 8th, 2-4pm</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Courier New">Commonwealth Institute, London</FONT=
>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Courier New">Admission Free</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Courier New">In recent years, digital art has pres=
ented an increasing curatorial challenge to art institutions. Digital art pr=
actice often suggests an emphasis upon systems rather than objects, remote r=
ather than local events, and privileges reproduction over authenticity. Sign=
ificant galleries such as the Walker Art Centre, ICA, Whitney Museum of Art=20=
and Tate Modern have all tackled the issue of institutional support of digit=
al art, with varying degrees of success.</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Courier New">This panel brings together a range of=
 curators involved in the definition of contemporary digital art. They will=20=
discuss a range of questions, including:</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Courier New">*Can digital art be considered within=
 a larger visual arts framework, or should it be considered as a separate di=
scipline?</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Courier New">*What are appropriate means for prese=
nting digital art -- are galleries valid display systems for it, or is a pro=
cess-based residency model more successful? </FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Courier New">*What are the specific aesthetic chal=
lenges of digital art and are the various institutional frameworks addressin=
g these challenges?</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Courier New">*Who is shaping these new models of a=
rtistic production? Are certain experimental art practices not being represe=
nted because of their means of production?</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Courier New">*How representative is the digital ar=
t that gets shown in galleries of the scope of actual digital art practice?<=
/FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Courier New">Panel members: Charlie Gere (chair),=20=
Helen Sloan, Honor Harger, Walter van der Cruijsen, Beryl Graham</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Courier New">The panel is part of Plug-in 03, annu=
al degree show of the London College of Music and Media, a Faculty of Thames=
 Valley University (TVU)</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Courier New">For further details and map, see </FO=
NT><A HREF=3D"http://www.tvu.ac.uk/plug-in03/prog3.html"><U><FONT COLOR=3D"#=
0000FF" SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Courier New">http://www.tvu.ac.uk/plug-in03/prog3.h=
tml</FONT></U></A>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Courier New">or contact James Coupe, Lecturer in=20=
Digital Art: [log in to unmask]</FONT>
</P>

</BODY>
</HTML>

------_=_NextPart_001_01C34091.23CB7E64--