Dear Joseph & All; The answer to your question must expose a few dirty secrets about "Caribbean scholars and scholarship": The Ian Randle Publication "Contending with Destiny" consists of the proceedings of a conference held at UWI Mona in 1999, whose theme was The Caribbean in the 21 st Century. The content illustrates clearly that when AngloCaribbean scholars talk about the Caribbean, they mean, generally, the Anglo Caribbean, unless some very specific agenda is served by invoking the non-AngloCaribbean. The essay by Ralph Premdas in the same volume (161) states explicitly the each island is concerned with its own affairs rather than any regional bloc. The failure of the Federation attempt demonstrated this, and provided a reason: the ethos of the Anglophone Caribbean is a particularly philistine, nakedly rapacious, and determinedly insular. Trinidadians, because of their wealth, look down on the rest of the Caribbean. The Francophone Caribbean, as Naipaul said, is France--this means stability, order, and devices that prevent psychopaths from strangling countries. They actually have very little in common with the AngloCaribbean, and there is some commerce, but nothing significant politically and culturally. The Hispanophone Caribbean, for all its problems has a notion of art and culture which has helped to sustain a sense of humanism if not humanity, or at least pockets of it. In the Anglophone Caribbean, nothing that does not support the ruling political party, or make money is considered to be of any importance. Read Walcott's "What the Twilight Says". Nothing seems set to change because of the social systems created by a particularly damaged set of post Independence leaders. Neither Williams nor Manley, nor any of the other players in the 1950s, could countenance losing their fiefdoms to federal control. Williams manipulated the culture of Trinidad into one of gross inefficiency, institutionalised corruption, and ethnic hostility to ensure he ruled till he died--he also exiled CLR James. The Manley dynasty destroyed Jamaica through the same hubristic sense of entitlement. Barbados is the most stable society in the region, and is justifiably contemptuous of Trinidad and Jamaica. The others (St Lucia, St Vincent etc) are simply too small to be considered nations in any but the nominal sense. UWI's intellectuals are far too preoccupied with preserving their positions of status and authority within the islands' political and social systems to bother with anything not directly concerned with that--this usually means a banal and intellectually shallow Afrocentrism, supporting and legitimising government cultural and economic policy which has more to do with African American politics and exporting primitivism for grants from first world foundations, than actually doing research on something they can't get a grant for. Readers of this list might have seen a post recently from me which described an IndoTrinidadian calypso tent--were it not for me, no one from UWI St Augustine would have even acknowledged its existence, or the social implications. There's also the fact that all islands, without exception, are far more interested in, and connected to, North America--the mass of the population see it as a place to escape to--than they are in their neighbours. Haiti is seen as a backward, violent place, if seen at all. And while many UWI graduate students probably know who CLR James is, I would estimate 95 per cent of them have read nothing of his, and know very little past "Beyond a Boundary". I would say the same is true of many lecturers. Still, you might want to look at Trinidadian calypsonian, David Rudder's song "Haiti"--Rudder has migrated to Canada, by the way. I don't know if this has helped. Raymond. --- [log in to unmask] wrote: > Greetings Fellow Caribbeanists: > I assigned Joan Dayan's "Haiti, History and the > Gods" (a very under-read > text) to my graduate class and we found ourselves > confronting the following > question: why is there such silence about Haiti in > Anglophone Caribbean > studies? Am I wrong in this? James tried to center > Haiti and the Haitian > revolution as crucial to New World black identity in > is classic text and > Lamming took up the call by discussing James in his > own now classic text, > "The Pleasures of Exile" but there seems to be very > little that has tried to > find an anchor in the event that is Haiti. Is Haiti > a kind of traumatic > kernel in West Indian identity? If Anglophone > intellectuals were able to > "journey" epistemologically and literally to > Castro's Cuba why have they not > done so with Haiti? Of course perhaps the most basic > barrier here is language > but language does not seem to have prevented an > encounter with Cuba? I'd be > interested in hearing other's thoughts on this. I'm > hoping that its a case of > my simply not knowing the literature. > Best > Joseph N. Clarke > Assistant Professor of Postcolonial Literatures > in English > The University of Pennsylvania > English Department, Bennett Hall 119 > 3340 Walnut Street > Philadelphia PA 19104-6273 USA > [log in to unmask] __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more http://taxes.yahoo.com/