Print

Print


I'd be interested in seeing the DVT protocol Rocky as I'm about to review our existing protocol
 
Cheers, Bill
----- Original Message -----
From: [log in to unmask]>Rocky
To: [log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask]
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 11:31 AM
Subject: Re: D-dimers and DVT

Ray,
 
OUr protocfol for DVT (which I can send you from work on Monday, if you like) starts with the Wells risk stratification.  We did not add anything to this as it seems to have the best evidence base at present.
We then do a benchtop D-dimer (Simplify, result in ten minutes - positive or negative, no numbers).  Again, there's good evidence for using this, mainly from the people in McMaster University in Canada, who seem to be world leaders in venous thrombo-embolism.
We discharge all low probability patients with a negative d-dimer.
All of the others, i.e. mid and high probability patients, havwe a duplex compression USS. If they have to wait for the scan for a day or two, we give them daily Clexane.   If the scan is negative and the D-dimer is negative, the patients are discharged.
If the scan is negative and the patient is positive, we repeat the scan at one week.  This is to rule out propagation of a calf DVT, not picked up by the first scan.  If this second scan is negative, we discharge the patient.
Anyone with a positive scan, obviously, is treated - we still admit them, but only because we haven't agreed a system for outpatient management and investigation for thrombophilia, if indicated, with our physicians.  But, at least, only patients with a proven DVT get into a bed.
I wrote this protocol after discussion with our Haematologist, who specialises in thrombosis and with a professor from McMaster.  I believe it is the best there is, in terms of the research evidence out there.
I think there may well also be a place for venometry (strain gauge plethysmography) to avoid doing so many scans.  This is currently being investigated in a big study at McMaster and I think the preliminary results may well be promising.
Our radiologists were initially somewhat unhappy at having to repeat scans on some patients but now fully accept that this is necessary and robust.
I hope this is of help.
If any others out there are interested, let me know and I can put the protocol on the site - it's only two pages.
 
Cheers,
 
Rocky.
----- Original Message -----
From: [log in to unmask]>Ray McGlone
To: [log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask]
Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 9:34 PM
Subject: D-dimers and DVT

I had thought that a D-dimer should not be requested on a patient with a clinical scoring of 3 or more as this was a high risk group for DVT. The patient should instead have a doppler etc.  A normal D-dimer test in a high risk group would not be a 100% reassuring.
 
However a trend has developed locally for all patients to need a D-dimer before any further investigation. So a Doppler may be refused even if the patient obviously has a DVT. e.g. drug addict injecting into groin with leg twice normal size.
 
What is happening in other hospitals?
 
 
Ray McGlone
 
A&E Consultant
Royal Lancaster Infirmary / Westmorland General Hospital
 
http://www.mbha.nhs.uk/morecambe_bay_hospitals_trust.htm