Andy Powell writes
> I'm not really sure... but my feeling is that 'simple DC' means simple
> literal string values and *nothing* else.
I share that view. If you want to have simple DC as a basic
interoperabilty format, you need to restrict it to the very
basics. Otherwise, anybody is going to stuff in whatever
structured construct they want as values of , and you end up with no
interoperability.
> I think we now have a good understanding of qualified DC in terms of
> element refinement and encoding schemes.
By "we" you probably mean the geeks on this list. It is not sure
that this understanding goes much beyond it.
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel mailto:[log in to unmask]
http://openlib.org/home/krichel
RePEc:per:1965-06-05:thomas_krichel
