 |
 |
> > > > I've never seen CIMI XML DTD for DC. Could you supply a ref? > > > >From the Bath Profile: > http://www.nlc-bnc.ca/bath/bp-app-d.htm Thanks, i'll have alook at it. > > > > Elsewhere (not in this document) > > > I've also seen 'dctype:Collection' which is promoting values of the > > > DCMI Type list to elements in their own right as well. This may be > > > all OK given namespaces, but I wonder if there has been DCMI > > > consensus on this. > > > > You want xml-schema bound metadata not using namespaces? > > > No. I understand that namespaces are necessary for XML. I'm > questioning using something which is a value in an encoding > scheme list as an XML element. But that is a question outside the > current document being reviewed. ? > > > > 8. The distinction between simple, unqualified and qualified is not > > > immediately obvious, especially as 'simple' and 'unqualified' are > > > sometimes used as synonymous. I can see why it's been made. It is > > > caused by the fact that 'audience' is in dcterms, the rest of which > > > is element refinements. > > > > ...and encoding schemes and...(what may come) > > But the encoding schemes are not in the dcterms namespace - > they are in the dcxml namespace. Encoding schemes are in terms-namespace - According to the namespace rec. rs > > Ann > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Mrs. Ann Apps. Senior Analyst - Research & Development, MIMAS, > University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK > Tel: +44 (0) 161 275 6039 Fax: +44 (0) 0161 275 6040 > Email: [log in to unmask] WWW: http://epub.mimas.ac.uk/ann.html > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- >