Hello All, I meant to follow up on this last week but didn't have time, so apologies for the delayed reply. I think that it is important we find out some information on what isn't being used and why, as Juanita suggests. But it is also quite difficult: a simple list of all the elements in IMS (with a tick box next to each and space for a line of explanation) would run to several pages. I shall, however include a question asking whether the respondent could provide us with a mapping of their element set to IMS, which would allow us to extract this information. We could focus our attention on a few elements and ask whether they are being used. I think this would complement Aida's suggestion of asking for an estimate of how many are used and which group they come from. So a quick question: are there any elements in IMS that you suspect are not being widely used? I'll lead with semantic density. I look forward to hearing any other suggestions. Regards, Phil. Dawn Holland wrote: > > Hello > > I think Aida' s suggestions for more precise information on which IMS > elements are being used or not is a good idea. > > However I have a vague recollection from the CETIS meeting in November (and > please correct me if I am wrong!) that going further and actually collecting > the individual elements not being used was suggested. > > For example, if the survey showed that x% of respondents didn't use the > Educational Element "semantic density", this information could then be > passed to IMS as evidence to suggest alternations or changes to the overall > schema. > > What does anyone else think? > > Dawn > > Dawn Holland > Metadata Project Officer (Maternity Cover) > The Jennie Lee Library > The Open University > Walton Hall > Milton Keynes > MK7 6AA > -- Phil Barker Learning Technology Advisor ICBL, Department of Computing and Electrical Engineering Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, EH14 4AS Tel: 0131 451 3278 Fax: 0131 451 3327 Web: http://www.icbl.hw.ac.uk/~philb/