Yes, please quote sources. Otherwise it comes off much too much like an Art
Bell "open line" call in rumor: frightening, but so often without base.
Gerald
----- Original Message -----
From: "Candice Ward" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 10:12 PM
Subject: Re: U.S. Concentration Camps FEMA and the Rex 84 Program
Mindfight: what I found most "disturbing" here was the total anonymity of
the webpage you directed us toward. It's one thing to take all information
from media and government sources with a large grain of salt, but quite
another to swallow whole _and publicize_ information that comes from
who-knows-where (Ray Bradbury's new book, maybe?). Try to be a bit more
discriminating, willya? This sort of thing just wastes our time and insults
our intelligence. Thanks--Candice
on 4/4/02 5:46 PM, mindfight at [log in to unmask] wrote:
> Dear Poets,
>
> Please consider this disturbing information
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> from: http://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/camps.html
>
> excerpt:
>
> The camps all have railroad facilities as well as roads leading to and
from
> the detention facilities. Many also have an airport nearby. The majority
of
> the camps can house a population of 20,000 prisoners. Currently, the
largest
> of these facilities is just outside of Fairbanks, Alaska. The Alaskan
> facility is a massive mental health facility and can hold approximately 2
> million people.
>
>
****************************************************************************
> *
>
>
> full text:
>
> There over 600 prison camps in the United States, all fully operational
and
> ready to receive prisoners. They are all staffed and even surrounded by
> full-time guards, but they are all empty. These camps are to be operated
by
> FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) should Martial Law need to be
> implemented in the United States.
> The Rex 84 Program was established on the reasoning that if a mass exodus
of
> illegal aliens crossed the Mexican/US border, they would be quickly
rounded
> up and detained in detention centers by FEMA. Rex 84 allowed many military
> bases to be closed down and to be turned into prisons.
>
> Operation Cable Splicer and Garden Plot are the two sub programs which
will
> be implemented once the Rex 84 program is initiated for its proper
purpose.
> Garden Plot is the program to control the population. Cable Splicer is the
> program for an orderly takeover of the state and local governments by the
> federal government. FEMA is the executive arm of the coming police state
and
> thus will head up all operations. The Presidential Executive Orders
already
> listed on the Federal Register also are part of the legal framework for
this
> operation.
>
> The camps all have railroad facilities as well as roads leading to and
from
> the detention facilities. Many also have an airport nearby. The majority
of
> the camps can house a population of 20,000 prisoners. Currently, the
largest
> of these facilities is just outside of Fairbanks, Alaska. The Alaskan
> facility is a massive mental health facility and can hold approximately 2
> million people.
>
>
> A person named Terry Kings wrote an article on his discoveries of camps
> located in southern California. His findings are as follows:
>
> Over the last couple months several of us have investigated three
soon-to-be
> prison camps in the Southern California area. We had heard about these
sites
> and wanted to see them for ourselves.
>
> The first one we observed was in Palmdale, California. It is not operating
> as a prison at the moment but is masquerading as part of a water facility.
> Now why would there be a facility of this nature out in the middle of
> nowhere with absolutely no prisoners? The fences that run for miles around
> this large facility all point inward, and there are large mounds of dirt
and
> dry moat surrounding the central area so the inside area is not visible
from
> the road. There are 3 large loading docks facing the entrance that can be
> observed from the road. What are these massive docks going to be loading?
>
> We observed white vans patrolling the area and one came out and greeted us
> with a friendly wave and followed us until we had driven safely beyond the
> area. What would have happened had we decided to enter the open gate or
ask
> questions?
>
> This facility is across the street from the Palmdale Water Department. The
> area around the Water Department has fences pointing outward, to keep
people
> out of this dangerous area so as not to drown. Yet, across the street, the
> fences all point inward. Why? To keep people in? What people? Who are
going
> to be it's occupants?
>
> There are also signs posted every 50 feet stating: State of California
> Trespassing Loitering Forbidden By Law Section 555 California Penal Code.
>
> The sign at the entrance says: Pearblossom Operations and Maintenance
> Subcenter Receiving Department, 34534 116th Street East. There is also a
> guard shack located at the entrance.
>
> We didn't venture into this facility, but did circle around it to see if
> there was anything else visible from the road. We saw miles of fences with
> the top points all directed inward. There is a railroad track that runs
next
> to the perimeter of this fenced area. The loading docks are large enough
to
> hold railroad cars.
>
> I wonder what they are planning for this facility? They could easily fit
> 100,000 people in this area. And who would the occupants be?
>
> Another site is located in Brand Park in Glendale. There are newly
> constructed fences (all outfitted with new wiring that point inward). The
> fences surround a dry reservoir. There are also new buildings situated in
> the area. We questioned the idea that there were four armed military
> personnel walking the park. Since when does a public park need armed
guards?
>
> A third site visited was in the San Fernando Valley, adjacent to the Water
> District. Again, the area around the actual Water District had fences
> logically pointing out (to keep people out of the dangerous area). And the
> rest of the adjacent area which went on for several miles was ringed with
> fences and barbed wire facing inward (to keep what or who in?) Also,
> interesting was the fact that the addition to the tops of the fences were
> fairly new as to not even contain any sign of rust on them. Within the
> grounds was a huge building that the guard said was a training range for
> policemen. There were newly constructed roads, new gray military looking
> buildings, and a landing strip. For what? Police cars were constantly
> patrolling the several mile perimeter of the area.
>
> From the parking lot of the Odyssey Restaurant a better view could be
taken
> of the area that was hidden from site from the highway. There was an area
> that contained about 100 black boxes that looked like railroad cars. We
had
> heard that loads of railroad cars have been manufactured in Oregon
outfitted
> with shackles. Would these be of that nature? From our position it was
hard
> to determine.
>
> In searching the Internet, I have discovered that there are about 600 of
> these prison sites around the country (and more literally popping up
> overnight do they work all night). They are manned, but yet do not contain
> prisoners. Why do they need all these non-operating prisons? What are they
> waiting for? We continuously hear that our current prisons are overcrowded
> and they are releasing prisoners because of this situation. But what about
> all these facilities? What are they really for? Why are there armed guards
> yet no one to protect themselves against? And what is going to be the
> kick-off point to put these facilities into operation?
>
> What would bring about a situation that would call into effect the need
for
> these new prison facilities? A man-made or natural catastrophe? An
> earthquake, panic due to Y2K, a massive poisoning, a panic of such
> dimensions to cause nationwide panic?
>
> Once a major disaster occurs (whether it is a real event or manufactured
> event does not matter) Martial Law is hurriedly put in place and we are
all
> in the hands of the government agencies (FEMA) who thus portray themselves
> as our protectors. Yet what happens when we question those in authority
and
> how they are taking away all of our freedoms? Will we be the ones detained
> in these camp sites? And who are they going to round up? Those with guns?
> Those who ask questions? Those that want to know what's really going on?
> Does that include any of us? The seekers of truth?
>
> When first coming across this information I was in a state of total
denial.
> How could this be? I believed our country was free, and always felt a
sense
> of comfort in knowing that as long as we didn't hurt others in observing
our
> freedom we were left to ourselves. Ideally we treated everyone with
respect
> and honored their uniqueness and hoped that others did likewise.
>
> It took an intensive year of searching into the hidden politics to
discover
> that we are as free as we believe we are. If we are in denial, we don't
see
> the signs that are staring at us, but keep our minds turned off and busy
> with all the mundane affairs of daily life.
>
> We just don't care enough to find out the real truth, and settle for the
> hand-fed stories that come our way over the major media sources
television,
> radio, newspaper, and magazines. But it's too late to turn back to the
days
> of blindfolds and hiding our heads in the sand because the reality is
> becoming very clear. The time is fast approaching when we will be the ones
> asking "What happened to our freedom? To our free speech? To our right to
> protect ourselves and our family? To think as an individual? To express
> ourselves in whatever way we wish?"
>
> Once we challenge that freedom we find out how free we really are. How
many
> are willing to take up that challenge? Very few indeed, otherwise we
wouldn'
> t find ourselves in the situation that we are in at the present time. We
> wouldn't have let things progress and get out of the hands of the public
and
> into the hands of those that seek to keep us under their control no matter
> what it takes, and that includes the use of force and detainment for those
> that ask the wrong questions.
>
> Will asking questions be outlawed next? Several instances have recently
been
> reported where those that were asking questions that came too near the
> untold truth (the cover up) were removed from the press conferences and
from
> the public's ear. Also, those that wanted to speak to the press were
> detained and either imprisoned, locked in a psychiatric hospital,
> slaughtered (through make-believe suicides) or discredited.
>
> Why are we all in denial over these possibilities? Didn't we hear about
> prison camps in Germany, and even in the United States during World War
II?
> Japanese individuals were rounded up and placed in determent camps during
> the duration of the War. Where was their freedom?
>
> You don't think it could happen to you? Obviously those rounded up and
> killed didn't think it could happen to them either. How could decent
people
> have witnessed such atrocities and still said nothing? Are we going to do
> the same here as they cart off one by one those individuals who are taking
a
> stand for the rights of the citizens as they expose the truth happening
> behind the scenes? Are we all going to sit there and wonder what happened
to
> this country of ours? Where did we go wrong? How could we let it happen?
>
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> jmp
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Pierre Reverdy
>
>
>
> "The image is a pure creation of the mind, it cannot be born from a
> comparison, but comes from the bringing together of two distant realities
> {.} An image is not powerful because it is brutal and fantastic, but
because
> the association of ideas is distant and true".
>
>
>
> "L'image est une création pure de l'esprit, elle ne peut naître d'une
> comparaison, mais du rapprochement de deux réalités {.} Une image n'est
pas
> forte parce qu'elle est brutale ou fantastique, mais parce que
l'association
> des idées est lointaine est juste´.
>
>
>
> Le gant de crin {first edition 1927}, Paris, Flammarion, 1968; p. 30.
