0{ }5
New perspectives on the relation
between history and philosophy of
science
WE APOLOGIZE FOR MULTIPLE POSTINGS.
Joint Meeting of the Division of History of Science
and the Division of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science,
International Union of History and Philosophy of Science
New perspectives on the relation
between history and philosophy of science
To be held from October 3rd, 2 pm. until October 5th, 7 pm
At Ecole normale supérieure,
45 et 29, rue d'Ulm
75005 Paris
France
{ HYPERLINK http://www.ens.fr/international/UK/ }http://www.ens.fr/international/UK/
Attendance is open and without charge. The plenary sessions will be
held on
October 3 and 4 in the Jules Ferry auditorium, underground level, 29,
rue
d'Ulm, and on October 5 on the main campus, 45, rue d'Ulm, in Salle
Dussane.
A book exhibit will be held on the main campus, 45, rue d'Ulm.
We also remind you that a constitutive general assembly of a new
learned
society, Societe de philosophie des sciences, will be held on the
morning
of October 3rd, beginning at 9:30, in the Salle des Actes, 45, rue d'Ulm.
All those interested in participation in this new, mainly but not
exclusively francophone, body, are welcome to attend.
The full program of the event is available on the Web :
http://www.cavailles.ens.fr/annonces.html
For information, please contact
[log in to unmask]
You will find below the final program.
Symposium de la Joint Commission de la Division d’histoire
des sciences (DHS)
et de la Division de logique, méthodologie et philosophie des
sciences (DLMPS),
Union internationale d’histoire et philosophie des sciences
(UIHPS)
Histoire et philosophie des sciences :
Vers une nouvelle alliance ?
3 – 5 octobre 2002
Ecole normale supérieure,
29 et 45, rue d'Ulm, Paris, France
Programme
Jeudi 3 octobre 2002
Session plénière (14h30-16h30)
14h-14h30 Ouverture du colloque – Allocutions
14h30-15h30 M. GRENE (USA) – Toward an historical-
ecological philosophy of science
15h30-16h30M. DASCAL (Israël) – The is/ought divide
and the role of controversies in the history
and philosophy of science
Sessions parallèles (17h-18h)
17h-17h40P. Mongin (France) – Peut-on parler de progrès dans
une discipline normative ? L’exemple de l’économie
normative ?
17h40-18hA. Leplège (France) – Invariance et modèles de
mesure dans les sciences sociales : introduction à
l’œuvre de Georg Rasch
17h-17h20V. Kindi (Grèce) – On the relation of history of science
to philosophy of science in the case of Kuhn
17h20-17h40J.-M. Roy (France) – L’inachèvement de la révolution
kuhnienne : l’épistémologie historique à l’heure des
bilans
17h40-18hS. Nazaran (USA) – Kuhn’s French Connection: Emile
Meyerson and Hélène Metzger
17h-17h20S. Franceschelli (France) – Exigence de
compréhension et genèse de nouvelles
connaissances : quelques exemples dans l’étude de
la transition vers la turbulence
17h20-17h40M. Stöltzner (Allemagne) – Can the claim for historical
justice serve as a pragmatic motive of theory choice?
17h40-18hS. Rahman (France) – Was the Vienna circle’s project
of a unified science the neglected child of the French
encyclopaedists?
17h-17h20J. Wright (Australie) – Rationality and the point of
scientific language games
17h20-17h40S. Boukhris (France) – Inductive inertia and learning
form experience in the light of the continuum of
inductive methods
17h40-18hB. Hardy-Vallée (Canada) – La science, l’hypothèse et
la science de l’hypothèse
Sessionplénière (18h-19h)
18h-19hB.V. SUBBARAYAPPA (Inde) – Scientific
education and Indian social milieu
Vendredi 4 octobre 2002
Session plénière (9h-12h30)
9h-10h E. McMULLIN (USA) – Philosophy of
science has a history too!
10h-11hR. RASHED (France) – L’art analytique :
entre histoire et philosophie
des mathématiques
11h30-12h30 H. KRAGH (Danemark) – The relative
relativity of science
Sessions parallèles (14h-16h)
14h-15h30L. Soler, J.-P. Narboux, I. Peschard, A. Bienvenu
(France) – Contenu, implications et influences de la
conception kuhnienne des rapports entre histoire et
philosophie des sciences
15h30-16h A. Petrovic (Yougoslavie) – Traditional and revolutionary
knowledge
14h-15h30F. Steinle (Allemagne, Suisse), T. Arabatzis (Grèce),
S. Mueller-Wille (Allemagne) – History and philosophy
of science: perspectives on their interdependence
15h30-16hA. Rosenberg (USA) – Can we reconcile naturalistic
philosophy of science and the history of science?
14h-15h30F. Burgat, B. de Montera, J. Delord (France) –
Emotions, cognition et nouvelles perspectives sur la
différence anthropozoologique
15h30-16h L. Faucher (Canada) – La psychologie évolutionniste en
tant que théorie interdomaines
14h-14h30M. Morange (France) – The return of a forgotten
question: What is life?
14h30-15hR. N. Brandon (USA) – Hypothetico-deductivism in the
philosophy of biology: away from Popper and back to
Bernard
15h-15h30I. H. Stamhuis (Pays-Bas) – Reactions of innovative
scientists on each others’ theories. Hugo de Vries,
Weismann and Mendel
15h30-16hP. Lorenzano (Argentine) – The relevance of
philosophical analyses in the improvement of our
historical understanding: the structuralist view of
theories and the history of genetics
Session plénière (16h30-17h30)
16h30-17h30 R. FOX (Royaume-Uni) – The way we lived,
and the way we live now
Sessions parallèles (17h30-19h)
17h30-19hM.-C. Maurel, P.-A. Miquel, J. Ricard, S. Tirard (France)
– Les origines de la vie : aspects historique,
philosophique et scientifique
17h30-19hA. Brenner, D. Parrochia, S. Ruphy (France) –
L’histoire comme laboratoire ou dialectique :
Feyerabend, Laudan et l’école française ; Une
épistémologie bachelardienne est-elle encore
possible aujourd’hui ? ; Unité ou pluralité des
sciences : vers un renouvellement du débat
17h30-18h D. Mayo, J. A. Miller (USA) – Normative naturalism: An error
statistical perspective
18h-18h30F. Bouchard (USA) – From Peirce and Fisher to
contemporary philosophy of biology: Statistical
explanations and ensemble properties
18h30-19h M. Bradie (USA) – Quine’s scientific epistemology
17h30-18h A. Kremer-Marietti (France) – Perception et conception du
point de vue cognitif
18h-18h30 P. Livet (France) – Le devenir des modèles connexionnistes
18h30-19h G. Usberti (Italie) – Materialism between metaphysics and
ideology
Session plénière (20h30-21h30)
20h30-21h30D. LECOURT, J.-M. BERTHELOT
(France) – L’enseignement de la
philosophie et de l’histoire de sciences
dans les cursus scientifiques
Samedi 5 Octobre 2002
Session plénière (9h30-12h30)
10h-11hA.C. K.P. REGNER (Brésil) – Rhetoric
and scientific rationality: A crossing point
for the history and the philosophy of
science
11h-12hR. FJELLAND (Norvège) – Philosophy of
science as scientific literacy
Session plénière (14h-15h)
14h-15hJ. M. TORRES (Argentine) – The effect of
methodology on life sciences bases for a
joint program for philosophy and history
of science
Sessions parallèles (15h-16h)
15h-15h20R. de Andrade Martins (Brésil) – The relevance of
HPS to scientific practice: An axiological approach to
scientific methodology
15h20-15h40G. Guillaumin (Mexique) – Beyond normativism and
descriptivism in the history of science
15h40-16hJ.-C. Dupont (France) – La collaboration de Chaïm
Perelman à la revue Dialectica (1947-1964) : une
communication modèle entre l’épistémologie des
sciences exactes et des sciences normatives.
15h-15h20M. Kirsch (France) – L’induction naturalisée ?
Remarques sur le naturalisme évolutionniste
appliqué à l’histoire et à la philosophie des sciences
15h20-15h40V. Guillin (France) – How to take a wrong turn: Anti-
psychologism in France. Rationale for a rebuttal
15h40-16hE. Machery (France) – Concepts theories: Old ideas in
disguise?
15h-15h20I. Yapi Ayenon (Côte d’Ivoire) – L’induction chez John
Herschel
15h20-15h40G. Choquette (France) – Les mécanismes
métaphoriques et métonymiques à l’œuvre dans le
développement des connaissances
15h40-16hS. Allouche (France) – Un problème pour l’histoire et
pour la philosophie des sciences : la notion de
« techno-science »
15h-15h20C. K. Raju (Inde) – The influence of history on the
philosophy of science
15h20-15h40T. Dahl (Norvège) – Ancient and modern knowledge
production – Two different social and epistemological
practices
15h40-16hP. Cassou-Noguès (France) – Pour une histoire des
marges
Session plénière (16h30-18h30)
16h30-17h30E. MENDELSOHN (USA) – The history of
science and its discontents: Moods and
movements
17h30-18h30Conclusions
