I wasn't insulted Sarah, just putting another point of view. Judi ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sarah Pink" <[log in to unmask]> To: <[log in to unmask]> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:43 PM > For the list aswell: > > Judi, > > I was referring to the fact that re-chartering would mean that those > who automatically chartered (that was the way it used to work) > would also submit evidence of continual professional development. > > Maybe that would be a good/fairer thing for everyone? > > I apologise if I insulted you, that wasn't the intention. > > Thanks > > Sarah > > > Sarah Pink > Assistant Librarian > _______________________________________________________ > This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the above named > only and may be confidential. If they have come to you in error you must > not copy or show them to anyone, nor should you take any action based on > them, other than to notify the error by replying to the sender. >