Print

Print


I wasn't insulted Sarah, just putting another point of view.

Judi
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sarah Pink" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:43 PM


> For the list aswell:
>
> Judi,
>
> I was referring to the fact that re-chartering would mean that those
> who automatically chartered (that was the way it used to work)
> would also submit evidence of continual professional development.
>
> Maybe that would be a good/fairer thing for everyone?
>
> I apologise if I insulted you, that wasn't the intention.
>
> Thanks
>
> Sarah
>
>
> Sarah Pink
> Assistant Librarian
> _______________________________________________________
> This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the above named
> only and may be confidential.  If they have come to you in error you must
> not copy or show them to anyone, nor should you take any action based on
> them, other than to notify the error by replying to the sender.
>