 |
 |
> > > Ed, > > The example is very helpful. > > Some of these map to Dublin Core elements, so for consistency > it might be a good idea to make sure that formats conform to > the standard. I haven't really kept up with the NKOS > recommendations so don't know whether the example diverges > from Dublin Core in order to conform to NKOS. For example: > > date should be in the format 1993-12-08 > > I think en is the language (don't remember seeing en-uk in > the dublin core recommended list; is this an NKOS standard?) > > coverage. I don't know whether this should be more > structured, with the qualifiers 'temporal' and 'spatial' included. > > Regards > > Daphne > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Lee, Edmund > > Sent: 11 July 2002 10:39 > > To: Charles, Daphne > > Subject: RE: [fish.members] A New Vote Has Been Posted - To > accept the > > revised metadata standard for INSCRIPTION > > > > > > Thanks Daphne - and no its not too late at all, > > > > The element 'Coverage' in the new format covers both area and > > timespans. I've just uploaded a sample description to the > > fish.members group file archive which makes this a bit > > clearer. I'm not sure that this is entirely appropriate for > > our needs , although it matches the NKOS standard. I'd > > welcome discussion of this point on the fish.members group if > > you have the time to post something. > > > > The metadata entry url would serve simply to help in > > automatic construction of the web pages, serving as the link > > between the 'list of lists' display and the 'full > > description' display. The sample data would be a link to a > > page that contained sample terms from the full standard (this > > sample data would also be included in the INSCRIPTION web > > site). The values for all of these would need to be checked > > with Gordon. The full resource url would be a link to a site > > outside of INSCRIPTION where the full resource was available > > (e.g. our thesaurus browser pages). > > > > Ed > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Charles, Daphne > > > Sent: 11 July 2002 09:59 > > > To: Lee, Edmund > > > Subject: RE: [fish.members] A New Vote Has Been Posted - To > > accept the > > > revised metadata standard for INSCRIPTION > > > > > > > > > > > > Ed, > > > > > > A couple of points (and I realise I'm a bit late on this) > > > > > > Some examples would have been useful, as it is difficult to > > > grasp the difference between all the various urls > > > (identifier, metadata entry, full resource etc.) > > > > > > Also, has the coverage (spatial) disappeared in the new draft? > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > Daphne > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]] > > > > Sent: 09 July 2002 17:31 > > > > To: [log in to unmask] > > > > Subject: [fish.members] A New Vote Has Been Posted - To > accept the > > > > revised metadata standard for INSCRIPTION > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear SmartGroups.com user, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A new vote has been created for the group: Forum on > > > > Information Standards in Heritage > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The motion is: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To accept the revised metadata standard for INSCRIPTION > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you would like to vote on this issue, visit the > following URL: > > > > > > > > > > http://www.smartgroups.com/vote/votevote.cfm?EID=1175795&GID=797778 > > > > > > > > -- > > > > If you want to share pictures, use the calendar, or start a vote > > > > visit http://www.smartgroups.com/groups/fish.members > > > > > > > > To leave the group, email: > > [log in to unmask] > > > > > > > > > >