Print

Print


Dan (and everyone) --

I agree that there is a profound value in illustrating philosophical concepts --
what I had been interested in was whether and how a film might be thought to do
more than that, and whether (as Clark and others suggest) there might be a
distinctive contribution to philosophy possible through film (as opposed to
written text).

What Dan says about illustration, though, does suggest something along these
lines and makes me think of other examples.  He writes that: "To be a lucid and
apt illustration of a philosophical concept is, all other things being equal, a
good making characteristic for a work or art, in my view.  Not only for its
pedagogical value, but as a concrete embodiment of real human alternatives."

This suggests that what a film may do (and it has this capacity in common with
narrative literary works) is not only illustrate a theme or a principle or an
idea, but at the same time present a challenge to that idea, showing it up as
both compelling and yet not fully adequate to the reality it purports to
describe, so that the idea itself gets "fleshed out" in the course of the
presentation of the example.  Of course examples come up all the time in written
philosophy, but the tendency is to use these examples as illustrations -- whether
of the idea in question or of a counter-idea.  So the example in this case tends
to be abstract -- you are supposed to get something specific from it and not
something else.  A convincing narrative or film is not like this -- which is
largely what makes it convincing.  We still need, however, to make a distinction
(suggested by Dan's examples of Sartre and Dostoevsky) between a film (or
literary) narrative that stands on its own as an event or series of events in
their own right -- and the narrative that, while standing on its own as a
convincing presentation at the same time invokes or calls upon the viewer to
consider this narrative in relation to a theme or principle.  So that the film
itself seems to "say": consider this principle and consider it in relation to
this example.  The distinctively "philosophical" film (in this sense) would be
the one that is structured so as to raise the question: what does this narrative
say about this principle?

A set of film examples that comes to mind is Kieslowski's Decalogue series.  In
this case the principle is explicitly drawn to the viewer's attention by the
title of the series and the individual film.  And yet I am inclined to say
(without having yet made a detailed study of the individual films, but having at
least viewed them all) that to make sense of each narrative you have to invoke
the principle indicated by its title.  The film about adultery, for example,
shows (in a detailed and concrete way that is best seen and not merely described)
both that there is something serious and profound at least for our world still
today -- not to be simply brushed aside or ignored -- expressed in the ancient
Judaic commandment against marital infidelity -- and that at the same time the
real significance and moral implications of this prescription are deeply
problematic.  I could say basically the same thing about each film, plugging in a
different law -- but the key is that this general formula doesn't even approach
the complexity and subtlety and compelling nature of the way these problematics
are dealt with in each individual film (-- of course, some are more successful
than others).  I would contend that this quality makes these films philosophical
in their own right and not merely as appendages to "moral philosophy."  Does
anybody agree?  (Of course: nothing that I have said here still distinguishes the
philosophical merits of film from the philosophical potential of literature; I
still don't have much to say on that, though I have heard some interesting things
from Clark and Richard and others on this.  I do have an example in mind, that I
might discuss in another post when I get a chance.)

Nate

--
Nathan Andersen
Assistant Professor of Philosophy
Collegium of Letters
Eckerd College
4200 54th Ave. S.             Phone: (727) 864-7551
St. Petersburg, FL 33712      Fax:   (727) 864-8354
U.S.A.                        E-mail: [log in to unmask]