Many thanks to all those who offered their advice regarding my problem concerning differences in parameter estimates when a replicated-data node was included.  My apologies to David, Andrew, Finn, and others that asked for a simple version of my model, though I am happy to say that I was unsuccessful in constructing a simple version that illustrated my problem because the in the interim, Finn Krogstad passed on a message that led me to the answer.  Here is the message he sent:
 
If it is true that "I've found that in my complex model, the inclusion
of the "generated data" node seriously affects the estimates of the
parameters" then you are doing something seriously wrong. Inclusion of
the generated data nodes should have no impact on the assympotic
distribution of the model parameters.  Either

-your generated data nodes are not just generated data, and you are
doing something that you are not describing, or more likely

-you are not achieving convergence, and what you are really seeing is
two equally valid but different simulation paths for converging on the
true distribution.  The further you run them, the more similar they
should become, but they will become identical only in asymtopia.

In such situations, I like to run a 'stripped down' version of the
problem (below) so I can study the question (e.g. does adding
uninstantiated posterior predictive nodes alter the posterior parameter
distributions?). 

If the two models converge with longer runs, then the second explanation
is true, if not then the first is true, and you should probably take
another look at the structure of your model (you might want to send a
copy).
I think the latter is true - my model had not converged.  It was a matter of both running longer chains (unfortunately, BUGS tends to crash for me when I run long chains of complex models and then ask for stats) and having a longer burn-in sequence.  Altering either chain length or burn-in length had little effect, but increasing both led me to see the theoretically-expected results. 
 
Again, my thanks to those who offered their time and thoughts, and of course to those who make the BUGS mailing list possible.
 
Roy Levy
Graduate Student
Department of Measurement, Statistics, and Evaluation
University of Maryland
College Park, MD USA
20742
 
------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is for discussion of modelling issues and the BUGS software. For help with crashes and error messages, first mail [log in to unmask]

To mail the BUGS list, mail to [log in to unmask] Before mailing, please check the archive at www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/bugs.html Please do not mail attachments to the list.

To leave the BUGS list, send LEAVE BUGS to [log in to unmask] If this fails, mail [log in to unmask], NOT the whole list