Print

Print


Thanks a lot to all who responded to my query, especially to Luciana Cuppo Csaki and Jeffrey Woolf, for highly informative messages.
 
Wishing everyone nice and quiet holidays,
 
Elena
 
PS. Marjorie Greene, that's interesting what you are saying about the current situation in the States. I wonder if Jews are also content with this routine circumcision performed basically for medical purposes or they prefer to have it organized according to their own rites and standards (a certain day, a special surgeon, a stone-edge knife etc.). . .
----- Original Message -----
From: [log in to unmask]>LCC
To: [log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask]
Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2001 1:30 AM
Subject: [M-R] circumcision

Elena:  here are some texts, and since translations vary, I'll cite the Latin of the Vulgate with references to the corresponding passages in the Bible.
Originally circumcision was the visible sign of the covenant between God and Abraham, the father of the chosen people (Gen. 17.10-14). Well before Christ, Moses stressed the character of sign of a far more important spiritual reality (Deut. 10.16), circumcidite igitur praeputium cordis vestri, "remove the foreskin from your heart". The concept of "circumcision of the heart" reappears in Jeremiah 4.4, circumcidimini Domino et auferte praeputia cordium vestrorum, the prophet said to those who were already circumcised.
The Christians built on a well-established principle when they abandoned the circumcision of the flesh in favor of the circumcision of the heart. Stephen, a circumcised Jew addressing circumcised Jews in Jerusalem, calls them dura cervice et incircumcisis cordibus et auribus (Acts 7.51) - circumcision had not touched their hearts or their ears. Acts 15 gives an account of the debate on the necessity of circumcision for converts from paganism to christianity. Peter, speaking with authority and seconded by James, concluded that the Holy Spirit had been given equally to Jews and Gentiles through faith, therefore circumcision was not necessary.  
Thus, Paul was the heir of a long-standing tradition when he wrote to the Galatians (Gal. 5.6) that in Christ, circumcision or lack thereof are irrelevant, and what matters is faith working through charity. In Rom. 2.29 he echoes Moses and Jeremiah, circumcisio cordis in spiritu, non littera, the circumcision of the heart is in the spirit, not in the letter, and can say to the Colossians (Col. 2.11) that they were circumcised in Christ, not by human circumcision and the removal of bodily flesh, but in the circumcision of Christ (Baptism).
Upon second thought, all this may not be strictly medieval, but quod scripsi, scripsi, Luciana
 
 
 
Luciana Cuppo Csaki
[log in to unmask]
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Aegean/9891