Print

Print


Apologies for cross-posting

My name is Steve Townend, I am a PhD student at the Institute of
Archaeology, UCL.

I am doing a short piece of research for an anectdotal conference contribution on the impact of archaeological research and theory generation
on those disciplines from which it has drawn over the years.
As an active discusion group in one of the key fields from which archaeology has taken inspiration, I am very interested in your impressions of that relationship.
I would like to pose four questions, which I would be grateful if you could answer frankly.

1. Having introduced myself as an archaeologist, what
images/understandings does that classification bring to mind?
2. Are you aware that archaeology has drawn heavily from the theoretical
frameworks of your discipline?
3. What is your impression of how theorisng within your own discipline
may be of benefit to
the study of human pasts?
4. Are you aware of any contributions that archaeology as a discipline
has made to theory building in your own discipline?

The piece is a closing contribution to a session entitled "Archaeology Talks Back: Contributions to Intra- and Extra-disciplinary Dialogues" and is intended as food for thought for a discipline that is trying to come to terms with its role in the academic pantheon.
In Gratitude,
Steve Townend

Institute of Archaeology,
31-34 Gordon Square,
London WC1H 0PY
ENGLAND



Steve Townend
Institute of Archaeology, UCL
31-34 Gordon Square
London WC1H 0PY