 |
 |
> From [log in to unmask] Thu Oct 18 12:20 MET 2001 > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 06:20:23 -0400 > From: Dan Brickley <[log in to unmask]> > Subject: Re: DC-ARCHITECTURE Digest - 16 Oct 2001 to 17 Oct 2001 (#2001-55 > ) > To: [log in to unmask] > > Since when has DC had complex, context-specific machine processable > constraints to represent? > > If and when we run into this, RDFS was designed to be incrementally > extensible: Schema can quite properly include additional > constraint information, expressed in extension languages such as DAML+OIL > or W3C's planned Web Ontology language. > > Dan > Thank's rs