 |
 |
> The information can be > placed anywhere where it is accessible to the public... Dear Sean, i'm mystified. By the way: I'm just looking at the RDF Schema for RDDL again: Could it be that there is a problem with the URI's this scheme assigns to RDDL properties and classes? My understanding of the namespace URI for RDDL is http://www.rddl.org/ - but the properties and classes defined in the RDF Scheme for RDDL seem to have rather curious URI's - They are rdf:ID coded!! Could it be that the information has been placed at the wrong place? Why we need xlink:title to declare dc:title ? - They have almost identic semantics - Curiously nobody seems to care that this information a machine get's nowhere - or? Cheer rs