 |
 |
Ian Stuart wrote: > ... > <?xml version="1.0"?> > <rdf:RDF > xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" > xmlns:dcq="http://purl.org/dc/qualifiers/1.1/" > xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" > > > <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/"> > <dc:title>World Wide Web Consortium</dc:title> > <dc:Identifier dcq:IdentifierType="issn">0001-3072</dc:Identifier> > </rdf:Description> > </rdf:RDF> > > ... > > This format of attribute and value was parseable at the end of August > (30/8/01 to be exact), and then working (discovered 5/9/01). I only > noticed this because a prototype that I had had working, had stopped > working when I went back to it after a couple of weeks away. > > I am using Perl Modules to parse, so I first assumed that they had > altered, however (a) the server had not been updated, and (b)testing on > another machines gave the same error. > I then had it tested on a completely different server, using a > Java-based system to parse the data - and still got the same error. > Next I checked the XML data, and tested the xsl with my test-data (that > was known to work in late August). > > My conclusion is that something in the spec has changed - is this wrong? > is there something I've missed? No, the spec didn't change. The above RDF isn't (and wasn't) correct. They just fixed the RDF parser to notice this syntax error. Annoying, I know. Regards, Stefan