 |
 |
That's an interesting assertion, about "objective academic discussion," to see on a _critical_ management list. I think the discussion was serious, and I challenge your atttempt to set the agenda. cheers S. =================================== On 13-Sep-2001 Eugenia Kemble, Shanker Inst. told me: > You're instincts are right. It would seem that serious, objective > academic > discussion on its designated agenda is not what this group is really > about. ---------------------------------- Sent by Steven's Thinkpad......... E-Mail: [log in to unmask] Date: 13-Sep-2001 Time: 09:10:59 ----------------------------------