Print

Print


I agree.  Let's let this sleeping beast lie for a bit longer.

Diane

At 04:55 PM 6/11/2001 +0200, you wrote:
>Dear all,
>
>In the context of discussing an Agent Core, we might need to
>consider an issue that Roland raised in an earlier note:
>
>Roland wrote:
> >MARC relator terms for CCP cause an architectural issue: They are
> >refinements for the imaginary agent element.  They in my opinion they
> >overlap but do not refine any of CCP:  They just live in an ontology
> >different from CCP - which can be used parallel with CCP - no objection
> >from me to parallel use. Parallel use is simply discarded on dumb down,
> >whereas recognized refinement is substituted by it's dc parent
> >element.
>
>I'm not sure this is an urgent problem.  If it were, we could consider
>reactivating the old proposal to create an element "agent", of which
>Creator, Contributor, and Publisher were sub-properties.  Then at least
>we wouldn't have to specify which element(s) were modified by (for
>example) Illustrator.
>
>Tom
>
>_______________________________________________________________________________
>Dr. Thomas
>Baker                                            [log in to unmask]
>GMD Library
>Schloss
>Birlinghoven                                           +49-2241-14-2352
>53754 Sankt Augustin, Germany                              fax
>+49-2241-14-2619