I agree. Let's let this sleeping beast lie for a bit longer. Diane At 04:55 PM 6/11/2001 +0200, you wrote: >Dear all, > >In the context of discussing an Agent Core, we might need to >consider an issue that Roland raised in an earlier note: > >Roland wrote: > >MARC relator terms for CCP cause an architectural issue: They are > >refinements for the imaginary agent element. They in my opinion they > >overlap but do not refine any of CCP: They just live in an ontology > >different from CCP - which can be used parallel with CCP - no objection > >from me to parallel use. Parallel use is simply discarded on dumb down, > >whereas recognized refinement is substituted by it's dc parent > >element. > >I'm not sure this is an urgent problem. If it were, we could consider >reactivating the old proposal to create an element "agent", of which >Creator, Contributor, and Publisher were sub-properties. Then at least >we wouldn't have to specify which element(s) were modified by (for >example) Illustrator. > >Tom > >_______________________________________________________________________________ >Dr. Thomas >Baker [log in to unmask] >GMD Library >Schloss >Birlinghoven +49-2241-14-2352 >53754 Sankt Augustin, Germany fax >+49-2241-14-2619