 |
 |
Sean B. Palmer <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> For example, the appropriate literal of the band with the >> URI http://www.thebeatles.com/ would be "The Beatles". >> Don't you think so? > No, because domain names are "owned", or rented at least, so the owner > of the domain may not be happy if you associated that string with The > Beatles, and used it out of context. Fine... but for the sake of argument, let's talk about the resource for the band most people call "The Beatles". >> If not, what would you choose as the literal. > i.e., just set up a proprietary URI for it, and hang some RDFS stuff > off of it. Yes, but this doesn't answer the question -- what's the literal? That is -- if I say the author is the resource I describe above and my system needed a text string to represent the author, what should it use? I'd argue "The Beatles" would be the best. Don't you think so? -- [ Aaron Swartz | [log in to unmask] | http://www.aaronsw.com ]