Print

Print


----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Treharne Jones" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 1:48 PM
Subject: Re: Members in Uproar


> So there we have it - the answer to the question I asked:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> >Can I remind you that this is a list for discussion
> > on issues related to Physiotherapy theory and practice, and ask you to
get
> > back on track.  As professionals, it is expected of everyone that their
> > contributions will be scholarly, pertinent and of a subject worthy of
> > discussion.
>
> As you know I had thought it was up to the membership as a whole to decide
> the content of the list, and I was wrong. Perhaps it was naive of me to
> imagine that there was room for more lighthearted topics, but which could
> nevertheless be described as 'worthy for discussion'. I shall have to try
to
> be more scholarly in future.
>
> Robert


> Well done Robert,
Yes, you are naive,especially as you are a GP trainer. You must try to be
scholarly in future.

Paul Gurnett MCSP. SRP.
Chartered Physiotherapist.