----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Treharne Jones" <[log in to unmask]> To: <[log in to unmask]> Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 1:48 PM Subject: Re: Members in Uproar > So there we have it - the answer to the question I asked: > > ----- Original Message ----- > >Can I remind you that this is a list for discussion > > on issues related to Physiotherapy theory and practice, and ask you to get > > back on track. As professionals, it is expected of everyone that their > > contributions will be scholarly, pertinent and of a subject worthy of > > discussion. > > As you know I had thought it was up to the membership as a whole to decide > the content of the list, and I was wrong. Perhaps it was naive of me to > imagine that there was room for more lighthearted topics, but which could > nevertheless be described as 'worthy for discussion'. I shall have to try to > be more scholarly in future. > > Robert > Well done Robert, Yes, you are naive,especially as you are a GP trainer. You must try to be scholarly in future. Paul Gurnett MCSP. SRP. Chartered Physiotherapist.