Print

Print


medieval-religion: Scholarly discussions of medieval religion and culture

Following on from this, I have as part of my folk lore the notion that a
woman who died in childbirth died absolved from her sins no matter what her
previous life or state of mind/soul was / had been.

I have NO IDEA where I got this superstition from, but I would be interested
to know if anyone else has come across it, at what date and if it has any
(mediaeval) theological underpinning.

Brenda M. C.

----- Original Message -----
From: Aline Hornaday <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 6:46 PM
Subject: Re: de[con]secration/de-secration (bloodshed)


> medieval-religion: Scholarly discussions of medieval religion and culture
>
> It's perhaps a little late to contribute to this thread, but for the sake
> of completeness it seems worth mentioning that some canonists upheld a
> prohibition against holding a church funeral for women who died in
> childbirth, explicitly stated in Johannis Beleth summa de ecclesiasticis
> officiis, CCCM 41-41a, 2:315-316 & Honorius Augustodunensis, Gemma animae,
> PL 172, coll. 583, 589. But the canonist  Guillaume Durand de Mende
> disagreed, noting that if great care is taken to avoid soiling the church
> with blood, the dead woman's funeral may be held in church (Gullielmi
> Duranti rationale diuinorum officiorum, CCM 140, 1:62). It is pollution
> with blood that seems to be the main concern here.
>
> Aline Hornaday
>
>   At 06:58 AM 2/13/01 -0500, you wrote:
> >Women were not supposed to enter the altar area at all--though I suspect
> >this was often ignored when it was a question of cleaning.  Nevertheless,
> >purists would not allow women to touch the sacred vessels either.  Thus
any
> >untoward effect of women's natural functions was contained reasonably
well.
> >There is a famous letter attributed to Gregory the Great in Bede's
> >Ecclesiastical History denying the idea that women could be considered
> >"polluting" when menstruating or giving birth or otherwise functioning
> >according to God's plan but in general ecclesiastical authorities were
> >inclined to take no chances.
> >
> >Jo Ann
> >
> >The law locks up the man or woman
> >Who steals the goose from off the common
> >But leaves the greater villain loose
> >Who steals the common from the goose.
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Stephanie Budin <[log in to unmask]>
> >To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
> >Date: Monday, February 12, 2001 9:46 AM
> >Subject: Re: de[con]secration/de-secration (bloodshed)
> >
> >
> > >        Many Greetings from a new member,
> > >
> > >        Concerning bloodshed and sexual acts as defiling, was there any
> > >prohibition against giving birth within church space?
> > >
> > >        Stephanie Budin
>
> **********************************************************************
> To join the list, send the message: join medieval-religion YOUR NAME
> to: [log in to unmask]
> To send a message to the list, address it to:
> [log in to unmask]
> To leave the list, send the message: leave medieval-religion
> to: [log in to unmask]
> In order to report problems or to contact the list's owners, write to:
> [log in to unmask]
> For further information, visit our web site:
> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/medieval-religion.html
>

**********************************************************************
To join the list, send the message: join medieval-religion YOUR NAME
to: [log in to unmask]
To send a message to the list, address it to:
[log in to unmask]
To leave the list, send the message: leave medieval-religion
to: [log in to unmask]
In order to report problems or to contact the list's owners, write to:
[log in to unmask]
For further information, visit our web site:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/medieval-religion.html