Print

Print


-----Original Message-----
From: Doc Holiday [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 1:16 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Consultants for ATLS at night

>Would it suit you both, as a compromise, for a consultant to be within
30-40
>mins away at home, available for advice by phone and to come in for NOTHING
>LESS THAN A MAJOR INCIDENT and for your good ol' registrars to cover nights
>on site.

>And new registrars can accumulate experience in day
>shifts, with consultants on site, before undertaking their nights alone.

Two problems with this approach:
1. If a registrar is as good as a consultant at dealing with critically ill
patients, does that not imply that the training is too long? Why bother with
consultants at all? Unless you're saying that consultants are for admin and
major incidents (I have reservations about teaching if all the actual
patient care is being left to registrars)
2. Registrar numbers: You spend 5 years as a registrar (maybe 2 or 3 of
which you'ld be able to take on nights alone), 30 odd years as a consultant.
Seems to me you need 5 to 10 times as many consultants as registrars to
maintain a steady state (unless you're banking on leaving medicine, early
retirement on ill health etc). 5 registrars to provided 24/ 7 cover. 25 - 50
consultants per department (all working office hours, coming in for major
incidents). Massive expansion in office space. Wow.

Interested in Adrian Fogarty's timing of trauma. But have you looked at
medical emergencies as well? Here, our critically ill patients (including
trauma, medical, surgical, paeds etc) are pretty evenly spread through the
24 hours. Evening cover is not the best solution for my hospital.
There's two extreme look at this:
1. 24 hour consultant cover. OK, but expensive and dilutes consultant
experience. May be one solution for hospitals where consultants can't live
close (another solution, if I may put my pigeon among the cats, being for
critically ill patients to bypass these hospitals and their A and E
departments to be downgraded to minor injuries units)
2. Enough consultants to provide a consultant available 24/ 7 within 15
minutes to deal with critically ill patients. Crucially, the lowest number
of consultants needed (and thus the highest level of experience and lowest
costs) is achieved when consultants delegate as much of the more 'minor'
work as possible (I don't foresee a department where any consultant is not
seeing enough minor injuries to maintain expertise) i.e. where consultants
come in as required rather than working fixed evening, weekend or daytime
sessions.
Might be the best solution for some hospitals is for consultants to be in
the minimum time neccessary to provide teaching and admin support, and the
rest of the time be on call from close to, even if that meant no consultant
in the department for a large part of office hours, let alone evenings.
Don't be appalled at consultants all going home at 5 if it means there's
better cover for the sicker patients at nights, and they have more time to
spend on teaching and audit during the day. Maybe we could provide a better
service if we were prepared to work ourselves into the ground, but for a
given amount of work done, a better service will be provioded if it is more
focussed.

BTW, on the number of consultants for 24/ 7 cover, check out the BMA
recommendations: Evening work to count double; night and weekend triple.
Works out at the equivalent of 389 hours/ week to be covered. Even accepting
Alan Milburn's 8 NHDs (28 hours) fixed sessions, still needs 14 consultants
plus cover for leave to have one person in the dept. May not be realistic,
but if we start out with an idea of resident cover with 8 consultants then
negotiate down...

One thing to remember about the US experience is their burn out rate (12%
p.a. among attendings). Not something to aim for.

Liked Jim Thompson's contribution. Agree up to a point. Problem is that
nurses are good at compying with protocols- fine if you're strict ATLS, but
sometimes you need to deviate; nurses have limited practical skills compared
to consultants (sometimes as consultant team leader I need to go hands on
because there is a technique that nobody else is good at); and UK
consultants probably get little enough serious trauma experience anyway
without diluting it further. Also, if there's going to be a consultant
available anyway for other critically ill patients... Still, for the old
style departments with SHOs and absentee consultants it may be an idea.

Matt Dunn
Warwick