 |
 |
Excuse me? There was nothing about lists of do's and don't's in my post, but merely an invitation to listees to participate in an ethics statement for Poetryetc if anyone wished to do so. As it happens, I agree with you, Andrew, that openness and flexibility within the bounds of civility works best. But this is everyone's list, so it seemed important to give everyone a chance to voice his/her own perspective. And if we could all "stay civil and open," there'd be no need for even the JK-style short list, would there? Candice on 7/10/01 10:00 PM, Andrew Burke at [log in to unmask] wrote: > No, nah-no, nah-no-no-no, please don't. I liked John's loose yet strict > list which he posted some time back (and everytime some mischief maker came > along). If we start hoisting up lists of Don'ts we will pretty soon become > a Police Site. No, please, let's stay open within the widest bounds. > Resurrect John's list someone, pledase, and let's stay civil and open. > > The Top Trio can have veto power. I also liked John's short answers to any > problems. They were blunt and to the point. No waffle. Let's go with that. > > Andrew > > ---------------------------------------- > Andrew Burke Copywriting > [log in to unmask] Creative Writing > http://www.bam.com.au/andrew/ Editing > ----------------------------------------