Kent, and this not at all an attempt of a critique, or an 'authorative' (ha ha) answer, but what I'm really intrigued with on this identity question is why you seem to use a theoretical scaffold for it. I use at times various personae, but they all end with the muddy tag of 'David Bircumshaw' underneath. I have lots of problems with that guy, btw, but I stick with him, possibly from a sense of sympathy. I certainly do at times want to be somebody else, for instance one richer, better looking, younger, miore talented, etc etc, but I stick with that half-wit, maybe if just for old times' sake, rather than let the personae run loose. As I said, this is not a reasoned argument, just a few thoughts and impressions. Best Dave ----- Original Message ----- From: "kent johnson" <[log in to unmask]> To: <[log in to unmask]> Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 12:07 AM Subject: Levinas's door/ collaboration > Doug, > > A felicitous typo, yours below: "'heteronymy' top"! > > You ask: > > >So: is there any hope whatsoever to achieve 'collaborative modes [that] > >would no doubt explode within an active counter-economy of heteronymy'? > > >And where is that 'heteronymy' top be found? > > Yes, I think moves outside normative attributional forms will expand > potentialities of collaboration, and not just between "really existing" > authors. If I keep quoting from my forthcoming interview, there won't be any > reason to publish it (!), but since the issues being raised connect directly > with some of the things I discuss there, I will go ahead and quote some > more-- the opening (unabashedly utopian as its tone may be), which I think > goes to the point of your question: > > > Bill Freind: When it was revealed that Araki Yasusada was in fact an > invention, many people were quick to call the work a hoax or a fake. Do > those terms seem accurate to you? > > KJ: Who is more authentic, who is less a reproduction: the poet who markets > his person and career, proudly hoarding his cultural capital into the mutual > fund of resume and copyright, or the poet who creates another poet or more > and refuses, to his dying day, to claim this writing under his own name? In > the special issue of Boundary 2, 99 Poets/1999, edited by Charles Bernstein, > the expatriate Syrian poet Adonis proposes the following about poetry's > future task: > > "To save itself, poetry will need to progressively espouse the unknown > eternal truths and refuse again and again to be regimented from the outside > by any kind of ideology, system, or institution....[P]oetry will have to > advance by exploring regions the invader cannot reach....[T]he traditional > view of the poem cannot survive, it will have to be transformed in its very > structure. Just as the traditional concept of poetry has already broadened > to exceed the limits of traditional forms of speech, so, in order to resist > the utilitarian goals which nearly strangled it this century, in order to > escape ideology, the structure of poetic language will have to open itself > to more movement, and move always toward a concept of the total poem." > > This is well said, and I would say that this movement or opening toward the > "total poem" will also require a sloughing-off of narrow and fake notions of > authenticity. It will mean a guerrilla war of the heart against the ideology > of the Author. > > > Q. What's wrong with the ideology of the Author? > > KJ: I don't mean that all poets would or should cease to attribute their > poems to their persons. That would be more than a quixotic proposal. So I'm > not suggesting that modes and versions of heteronymity will totally replace > traditional conceptions of authorship. Nor, I should say, will any move to > something truer and more authentic have anything to do with simple notions > of anonymity. As Mikhail Epstein, the prominent Russian theorist and critic > wrote in a letter to Yasusada's creator, Tosa Motokiyu, in 1996: > > "Poststructuralism has pronounced the death sentence for the individual > author(ship), but does this mean that we are doomed to return to the > pre-literary stage of anonymity? One cannot enter twice the same river, and > anonymity in its postauthorial, not pre-authorial, implementation will turn > into something different from folklore anonymity. What would be, then, a > progressive, not retrospective, way out of the crisis of individual > authorship? Not anonymity, I believe, but hyperauthorship." > > As in the physical world one has Newtonian and quantum mechanics coexisting > in paradoxical simultaneity, so also will classical Authorship and > heteronymic strangeness coexist. The problem is that literature is still > very solidly in pre-Einsteinian times, and the quantum realm has not even > yet begun to be observed... > > > Q: The quantum realm? > > KJ: I believe there will be, in this future and broad-based "refusal to be > regimented from the outside," a more subtle and fluid relationship with > poetic identity as legally and culturally, even biologically, circumscribed. > And in this resistance to regimentation, the circulation of created, > fully-realized hyperauthorships will become a vibrant and branching and > authentic utopian space, with schools and collaborations, journals and > sub-genres, critical forays and epistolary crossings. I think that readers > will flock to this apocryphal space and jump in, grateful to abide in > mystery and to pursue the traces, clues, and revelations its authors leave > behind. Poets both real and not real will move in shimmering ways back and > forth between realms and across times. Cross-disciplinary forms and genres > unimaginable at present will flower forth. It will be a "wavy" zone > impossible to appropriate or to discipline, because authorship in this > topography will not have a discrete location or body; it will be > continuum-like, a wave, to draw from Epstein again, going across times, > places, and personalities. > > But this will require strong conceptual moves that leave behind the > vanishing point of genetic ascription and push poetic- performative > activity-- sometimes illicitly and against "known laws"-- beyond the generic > canvass-horizon of the page. > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com >