 |
 |
but that's not really the point though - at least in terms of what i was attempting to recognise as something particularly vibrant. yes, and... best, jk Jill Jones wrote: > on 6/2/01 10:09 AM, John Kinsella at [log in to unmask] wrote: > > > that have interesting implications for > > poetic discourse in australia and elsewhere. and of course there are > > many interactions/dialogues in sydney etc. i highlighted one that i > > believe will develop into a dialogue with 'external' spaces. > > But there are many others which may also be significant - about 'spaces', > about language, about the 'written' poem, etc, etc. Just because those > taking part haven't been anointed by the old or new guards of anthologisers, > critics, reviewers doesn't negate that. It just means they don't have the > right mates. And hasn't that always been true? > > Cheers, > Jill > > _________________________________ > Jill Jones > 50 Ruby Street > Marrickville NSW 2204 > AUSTRALIA > > [log in to unmask] > http://homepages.ihug.com.au/~jpjones