 |
 |
Doug wrote: >but will say that, aside from just nt being all that nothered by the byplay >(it was read & dumped quite quickly), I do think the 'original' (hah!") >Kent Johnson, in his excerpts from the interview, had some interesting >points to make, & that (although I'm not sure I could ever create useful >heteronyms; but do like to collaborate with other texts, & therefore, >perhaps, lose 'self' as such in the act of writing) the problems he >approaches are ones we could & can take seriously. Yes, I agree - though I could wish the discussion could occur without some of the surrounding material. I am a little sad about the list abuse which is presently occuring. See how you feel after a couple of weeks of wading through logorrheic posts and a rash of ill-tempered resignations, which have already started. I've seen a list trashed before and it's not a pretty sight. Best Alison