Print

Print


hmm just to throw my penny worth in on this

i agree with paul that there is some issues here that i wonder if FISH can
take at least help, make some broad suggestions on or start the debate in
wider (especially with its national remit).

Increasingly we are looking at resources rather than just recording
systems. With CAD, GIS, digital images all being integrated into our
systems. Indeed we there has been many lectures and presentations
from ADS and the like. It seems to me that there is a number of problems
that are waiting in the wings that we may need to at least think about.

Especially in terms of .....

content standards for the numerous CAD and GIS layers (one good
example is the Historic landscape Characterisation projects that are
going on throughout the country .... all of which do not seem no base
standards so are likely to be impossible to bring together in any
meaningful way to the public or to non specialist)

Within archaeology we have embraced CAD and other such systems but
all this digitial archive we are generating does not have any base line
content standards.

I am not suggesting that we try a one size fits all... but maybe at least
some base line standards or principles may help with interopability of
information.

In many ways it is early days with the use of digital resources (photos,
GIS, CAD etc)... I wonder if it would be prudent to think about some of
these issues while the problem is relatively small.

Jason A. Siddall
National Trust SMR Officer
>>> "Lee, Edmund" <[log in to unmask]> 13/June/2001
10:52am >>>
Paul,

Yes I acept that GIS is one of the main technical challenges /
developments
facing managers of heritage and historic environment data. The issue for
FISH (as I see it) is to what can the heritage sector can influence
standards and initiatives that are driven by developments beyond our
sector.
Do you have any particular issues in mind that FISH has the remit and
influence to address?

Ed

 -----Original Message-----
From: Paul Gilman AAG Manager ES
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 12 June 2001 10:07
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Future Directions



        Amid all the discussions about future directions, can I suggest GIS
and spatial standards as
an important topic for consideration. I know that there are a number of
initiatives from OS in this field
but there are specific historic environment issues that ought to be
considered,
Paul Gilman
Heritage Information and Records Manager
Essex County Council


This e-mail (including any attachments) is intended only for the
recipient(s) named above.  It may contain confidential or privileged
information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any
other
person unless express permission is given.  If you are not a named
recipient, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail from your
system.
It is the recipient's responsibility to ensure that appropriate measures are
in place to check for software viruses.