At 1:55 pm +0000 20/12/01, Tommy Kennedy wrote: > >It seems to be down to interpretation of 7(4), 7(5) and 7(6). > >Disclosure is fairly straightforward for front office staff who have >been involved with the data subject. Or others who have been named >in previous correspondence, etc.... etc... >But I'm still not sure that it is "reasonable in all the >circumstances" to disclose the name of a back office employee who >has had no previous contact with the data subject. Particularly >where they play a supporting role and are never likely to be in >contact with the data subject, and they have refused consent for the >disclosure. To take the suggested divide between front office/back office staff, what if the back office people who have had no direct contact with the data subject are decision-makers/influencers who are too high up in the line of command to deal with him or her directly? In general, I wonder what the privacy interest is in withholding the name of someone who works for a public authority, and who is mentioned in the DS's file in course of carrying out his or duties in relation to the DS? (Of course, things are different where there is a risk of violence etc). A benchmark might be the provisions in the Subject Access modification orders for social work, education and health, which prevent the identities of staff/health professionals being withheld from the DS under section 7 of the DPA. [see the references to 'relevant person' in The Data Protection (Subject Access Modification) (Social Work) Order 2000 The Data Protection (Subject Access Modification) (Health) Order 2000 The Data Protection (Subject Access Modification) (Education) Order 2000] Maurice Frankel Campaign for Freedom of Information staff members' privacy interests are actually affected by identifying them to the DS? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ If you wish to leave this list please send the command leave data-protection to [log in to unmask] All user commands can be found at : - www.jiscmail.ac.uk/user-manual/summary-user-commands.htm all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please! ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^