 |
 |
Thanks for this. I think this is a very positive idea. Tim ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dr. Paul Hodgkin" <[log in to unmask]> To: <[log in to unmask]> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 3:18 PM Subject: Re: November's complexity meeting > I thought it would be useful to post something about cooperative inquiry > before we meet next week. The idea of a co-operative inquiry came up at > Exeter as a possible way to deepen our understanding of complexity issues. > There was a feeling that Tufton should move beyond being a talking shop > about complexity and a co-operative inquiry was suggested as one way > forward. Personally I think that a co-operative inquiry would provide a > good way to develop a deeper understanding of what complexity means in > practice and would be a good prelude to more formal studies. My own > experience of a co-operative inquiry was that it was a great way to test > and develop conceptual models and to find out what the real life problems > and opportunities in a particular area were. > The aim of hte session that I am facilitating next week is to decide > whether this is something we want to do or not. > All the best > Paul > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dan Munday [SMTP:[log in to unmask]] > Sent: 19 November 2001 07:15 > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Re: November's complexity meeting > > Apologies from me for nov 28. I agree with Chris, it would be good to move > into looking at research methods in more depth. I know that is on the > agenda this time with the co-operative enquiry and I am keen to know how > this goes and what the conclusions are. Do we need to hear from some of > these "computer modelling bods". There were some interesting letters on the > BMJ website from some following the complexity articles. > > Dan > > > On 19 November 2001 12:08, Chris Burton [SMTP:[log in to unmask]] > wrote: > > Regret I won't be at this one. > > > > My thought for the next one though: what about a workshop specifically > about > > research methods that go into complexity territory and bridge the gap > > between pure qualitative and quantitative stuff. > > > > Perhaps that's not even a Tufton, possibly that meeting should be > something > > else. > > > > Thoughts? > > > > Chris > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Complexity and chaos theories applied to primary medical and > > > social care [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of > > > Krysia Saul > > > Sent: 01 November 2001 12:54 > > > To: [log in to unmask] > > > Subject: November's complexity meeting > > > > > > > > > Hi everyone, at present only those listed below have confirmed their > > > wish to attend the November 28 conference. I suspect there are > > > more! Please can you let me know as soon as possible as I have > > > to t think about the hospitality arrangements. Many thanks, Krysia > > > > > > Julian Pratt > > > Hugh Reeve > > > Andrew Innes > > > Paul Hodgkin > > > Iona Heath (afternoon only) > > > Jo Poole > > > Judith Harvey > > > Anne Marie Cunningham > > > > > > > >