Print

Print


This is worth passing on. For our 'information'.

db


----- Original Message -----
From: <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 3:32 AM
Subject: addendum


> Subsubpoetics
>
> --------------------------- ListBot Sponsor --------------------------
> Build a marketing database and send targeted HTML and text e-mail
> newsletters to your customers with List Builder.
>
> http://www.listbuilder.com
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> In a message dated 3/1/01 9:30:49 AM, [log in to unmask]
writes:
>
> << ... that was part of the (initial, BritPo) problem.  There was (I don't
>
> think it was ONLY me) a real doubt as to whether Kent and Jacques were
Truly
>
> Separate Entities. >>
>
> What's fascinating about new media/genres is that literary devices have
not
> yet become routinized.   At the beginning of the novel, the epistolary
genre
> was, for example, scadalous for this very reason.  Now who cares?  One
reason
> people here & at Brit Po reacted so negatively was for the same
reason--Kent
> & I used persona & the epistolary form in a way that was still
> provocative--mainly because it was done as a series of *e-mails* on a
> Listserve.  But think of how much more provocative other experiments could
> still be.
>
> Kent
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, write to [log in to unmask]