Sorry, Graham, I thought we were talking about discrimination and using Christ as a convenient (and politically correct) punching bag. Given the history (and continuing) gross discrimination against people with disabilities in (mostly) non-Christian lands, I would have thought that this list would have avoided anti-Christian stereotyping, just as we try to avoid stereotyping images for people with disabilities. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Graham Palmer" <[log in to unmask]> To: <[log in to unmask]> Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2000 3:02 PM Subject: Re: Question for when the Christmas pudding has settled.... > In article <002a01c06f74$dd9cbca0$0101a8c0@pavilion>, Timothy Lillie > <[log in to unmask]> writes > > > >No, Friends, a careful review of history would show that there is plenty of > >blame to go around, no matter who you are.... > > > Oh dear, I thought we were talking about Jesus here and therefore, > obviously, about his, rather than anyone else's, followers. > > Just a thought, going back to the original posting, surely Jesus, given > as he was to 'healing the sick and lame', was firmly entrenched in the > Medical Model of disability > > -- > Graham > > ________________End of message______________________ > > Archives and tools for the Disability-Research Discussion List > are now located at: > > www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html > > You can JOIN or LEAVE the list from this web page. > ________________End of message______________________ Archives and tools for the Disability-Research Discussion List are now located at: www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html You can JOIN or LEAVE the list from this web page.