Print

Print


Sorry, Graham, I thought we were talking about discrimination and using
Christ as a convenient (and politically correct) punching bag.  Given the
history (and continuing) gross discrimination against people with
disabilities in (mostly) non-Christian lands, I would have thought that this
list would have avoided anti-Christian stereotyping, just as we try to avoid
stereotyping images for people with disabilities.



----- Original Message -----
From: "Graham Palmer" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2000 3:02 PM
Subject: Re: Question for when the Christmas pudding has settled....


> In article <002a01c06f74$dd9cbca0$0101a8c0@pavilion>, Timothy Lillie
> <[log in to unmask]> writes
> >
> >No, Friends, a careful review of history would show that there is plenty
of
> >blame to go around, no matter who you are....
> >
> Oh dear, I thought we were talking about Jesus here and therefore,
> obviously, about his, rather than anyone else's, followers.
>
> Just a thought, going back to the original posting, surely Jesus, given
> as he was to 'healing the sick and lame', was firmly entrenched in the
> Medical Model of disability
>
> --
> Graham
>
> ________________End of message______________________
>
> Archives and tools for the Disability-Research Discussion List
> are now located at:
>
> www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html
>
> You can JOIN or LEAVE the list from this web page.
>

________________End of message______________________

Archives and tools for the Disability-Research Discussion List
are now located at:

www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html

You can JOIN or LEAVE the list from this web page.