----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 12:13
AM
Subject: Re: Seniority of doctors
Yes Rob, I think the issue is bed sores and I also have my doubts in
that regard. As to the MTOS unexpected deaths you mention, I don't deny
there is a significant mortality in the elderly #NOF patient. I'm
not sure how these patients score in MTOS however - surely the elderly have
a significant expected mortality rate with this condition, while the
younger population do not...are there any MTOS experts out there? Anyway,
I'm still not convinced "fast-tracking" has a major influence on mortality,
over and above fast-tracking any of our other patients, many of whom are
just as deserving if you ask me. I just think it's a convenient, easily
measurable, performance indicator that misses the point - these patients
need analgesia, a bed and early surgery...the time they're warded is
immaterial. Also it's a single issue performance indicator, and that
worries me...if departments throw a lot of resources at such an issue,
something else will suffer as a result. And if we must tackle a single issue
then make it myocardium, lives or limbs in the first instance.
Regards
Adrian Fogarty
----- Original Message -----
I seem to remember this started as an issue of
bed-sores. Theory being that immobile NOF patients could develop
sores within as little as an hour on an A&E trolley, but that a
hospital bed would miraculously prevent these (I have my doubts - sore
prevention has more to do with good nursing care than the exact type of
hard surface !). Perhaps Ian Hepworth or one of the other nurses on the
list can help us tell if this idea was evidence based or just guesswork.
The early MTOS work threw up a lot of
"unexpected" trauma deaths with ISS 9 and perfect RTS (ie good physiology)
- fractured neck of femur being one of the main culprits. Early treatment
in A&E might well have a direct influence on whether the patient's
final triage card is green or black. This needs more research
though.
Cheers
Rob Cocks
HK