 |
 |
The initial request in this thread sought readings onThe equation of gender with women (and men) as is done in many of the works cited thus far in this thread reproduces a heterosexist bias in disability studies. Writers in the domains of feminist theory, gender studies, and queer theory have argued in this way for the past decade. I make this criticism of work done in disability studies at the end of a review of Carol Thomas's book Female Forms (Open University, 1999) which appears in the current issue of Disability and Society (vol 15, no. 5). In addition, I criticise the heterosexist conception of sex/gender that conditions work that has been done in disabled sexuality studies (e.g., Shakepeare et als.) in a paper entitled "Queering Disabled Sexuality Studies" which is forthcoming in the Journal of Disability and Sexuality (winter 2001). I argue there that in order to eliminate the heterosexist bias from disabled sexuality studies (and disability studies generally) it will not suffice to acknowledge the existence of non-normative sexual practices and identities (though this will certainly be required). Rather, the conception of gender which work in the field assumes must be renovated. Regards, Shelley Tremain Harilyn Rousso ([log in to unmask]) has developed a good syllabus for such a course. if you look at references in the Fine and Asch _Women with Disabilities: Essays in Psychology, Culture, and Politics_ you will get some ideas; Deborah Kent, ([log in to unmask]), has reviewed many recent collections of books on women and disability in _Women's Review of Books_ and _Feminist collections_. Harilyn Rousso is coediting a book on gender and special education that will be out soon, and that will have an updated overview article as well as many useful articles. A manual entitled _Building Community_ has recently been updated and is available from Educational Equity Concepts, New York, New York, which is designed to promote group discussion about disability and feminism, 114 East 32nd Street, New York, NY 10016. You should also look at the _Journal of Disability Policy Studies_ of 1997, I think, which published a special issue on women and disability. books by Krotoski et al, Nosek, et al, and Shakespeare, et al should be helpful. They are cited in the update article by Asch, Rousso, and Jefferies coming out in Rousso and Wehmeyer. That is all I can think of for now. Hope this helps. Adrienne Asch %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%