Print

Print


Dear colleagues 

I am about to conduct a (small) RCT of a continuing professional 
educational intervention with nurses comparing problem based 
learning with standard small group learning. 

Our proposed method of randomization was to use a computerized 
table of random numbers.  However the practicalities of  the 
situation mean we won't know the final list of participants really 
until the course starts and those participants wo register prior to 
the beginning of the course need to know which days they need to 
obtain as study leave (it is a part time course) as early as possible 
in order to make the necessary cover arrangements (the different 
groups are 'taught' on different days to avoid contamination 
between groups) .  So basically we need to randomly allocate 
people as soon as they register.  

q.1 - I am thinking about the best way to do this - is it by just 
tossing a coin for each individual ?       

q.2 When critically appraising an RCT we ask whether the control 
and intervention groups were similar at the start of the trial.  Now I 
am looking at the issue from the other end I am wondering how I 
can 'make sure' that the groups are similar at the start of the trial.  
It is after all possible that one group could end up much larger than 
 the other if the coin tossing method is used.     


(Hmmm now I have written this I think I have a better  answer - but I 
would like to hear your suggestions anyway) 

mark 

 
Mark Newman
ESRC Research Fellow
School of Life Long Learning and Education &
School of Health, Biological & Environmental Sciences 
Middlesex University
Furnival Building, Archway Campus
Highgate Hill
London N19 3UA
Tel 020 8362 6702 


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%