I would start back at defining your measurements, and what is the intervention. The outcome is not a test, the trial intervention is the test. The outcome should be stated with simple data measures, percents, etc. The intervention should have the descriptive measures applied, i.e. PPV, sens., spec., etc. I hope this is helpful, although my insights may not be complete. Kind Regards, Daniel L. Sontheimer, M.D. Asst. Prof. Of Family Medicine Spartanburg Family Medicine Residency 853 N. Church Street Suite 510 Spartanburg, SC 29303 Email: [log in to unmask] -----Original Message----- From: owen dempsey [SMTP:[log in to unmask]] Sent: Monday, March 27, 2000 6:23 AM To: Evidence-Based-Health Cc: Tim Coleman; Richard Neal; Michael. [log in to unmask] wakeha. northy. nhs. uk; Dawood Dassu Subject: accuracy of test and confidence in trial outcomes dear all a problem is puzzling us we have a RCT design; to simplify a bit: the primary outcome of interest is in effect a test (patient recall of being asked about their smoking by their GP); data suggests a sensitivity of approx 90% and specificity 80%. The PPV (which is the necesaary link between the test and the outcome of interest) will therefore vary depending upon the prevalence of the target condition (whether a patient was asked about their smoking at the last consultation with a GP). The trial intervention is designed to affect this target condition (to increase the prevalence); therefore the PPV of the test will vary in a way that we cannot predict. (and whose only measure is the PPV; which becomes a circular argument)) This seems to introduce another source of error affecting our ability to be confident about the effect of the intervention. Is this a significant problem or am I missing something? Have others had to deal with this; if so how? presumably this is a common trial problem when the outcome is measured via a test (less than 100% accurate)of any sort; has anything been written about this? TIA; you're my last hope O Owen Dempsey General Practitioner Senior Research Fellow Centre for Research in Primary Care Hallas Wing Nuffield Institute for Health 71-75 Clarendon Road University of Leeds Leeds LS2 9PL work: 01484-460298 (practice) work 0113-233-4835 (Leeds office) home: 01484-654794 e-mail: [log in to unmask] (home) [log in to unmask] (Leeds) << File: Owen Dempsey.vcf >>