Race/Racism/ Rudyard
Kipling:
I am convinced that RK upon
being asked to fill in one of those iniquitous 'landing cards' for
presentation at the immigration desk, would have written the word HUMAN in
the slot alongside the word RACE.
This is absolutely true. Those of us who are against
the EU find it vaguely irksome to be accused of 'xenophobia'. After
all, we are arguing for withdrawal from 'Europe' and reconnection with the
rest of the world, with its rich range of cultures, all of which the British
are more used to, and find easier to accommodate, than our continental
chums.
This brings me on to an exhibition at the National
Portrait Gallery, in which a number of
people in public life have selected photographs they regard as symbolising
the twentieth century. Trevor Phillips, the black broadcaster and
candidate for Deputy Mayor of London, has chosen among other things a
photograph of RK with King George V. He acknowledges RK's genius,
but regards him as an ideologist of imperialism, who helped to
'persuade' colonial subjects that they were unfit to govern
themselves. I don't support Phillips's party, but I think he is a man
of integrity and decency, who has worked hard, has an interesting mind and
will prove effective in office if elected. It might be worth writing
to him and trying to persuade him to view RK from a different
perspective.
Some other comments on political
correctness, the feminazis, etc.
As it has been some 45
years since I served in the Royal Navy when ship were most certainly
manned , I felt some diffidence about making categorical statements on the
issue of 'manning'. Having recently consulted several Naval officers
(including my ex-submariner son-in law) I am assured that H.M. Ships
are 'manned'.
I too have checked this and the word 'manned' is still
used, and applied as it should be to male and female personnel alike.
There are some sections of the services that remain off-limits to women, and
that is as it should be. The idea of training the fair sex for front
line roles is another example of barbarism and pagan insouciance
masquerading as 'progress'.
Emasculation of language is a project dreamed up by
blue-stockinged Sapphists and their male camp-followers, and is part of a
more general tendency towards creating a society of 'victims' pleading for
'rights'. They would have us believe that all our great women
novelists are 'victims' of 'language'. How absurd.
That is good enough for
me! Manned they will remain as far as I am
concerned.
When it comes to 'manning'
guns : the splendid ladies who were on the Anti Aircraft gun sites during
the 1939-45 conflict would be most upset to learn that they had no part to
play in the 'manning' of armament.
This illustrates clearly the point I have just
made. It would be very patronising to tell these brave ladies that
they should be addressed differently from their male colleagues. The
term 'lady' is politically incorrect, too. The centre of Oxford has a
large sign near St John's college saying 'Women's Toilet'. For much of
my undergraduate career I genuinely believed it was a feminist meeting place
with a satirical title!
The responsibility for
distortion of accurate terminology to suit 'politically correct' phraseology
rests entirely and sadly (in my opinion) with elements involved in a questionable
agenda.
Not only questionable, but downright
tendentious, and tyrannical also. I have heard of students being
marked down by left-wing academics for not using politically correct
terminology. Not all the younger generation have been brainwashed,
however. I am 33 and proudly politically incorrect. I was
immunised against political correctness when I was a boy of eight.
Having been encouraged to get ahead by my previous teacher, a lady of some
character, I then found myself in a class taught by a left-wing woman who
tried to stop me reading books 'too advanced' for my age. I was quite
successful in exposing her stupidity and ignorance. Once she set us
anagrams and one of the words was 'soal'. Having a map of the world at
home, I knew there was a country called 'Laos', but to her the correct
answer was 'also'. I then took the chalk in my hand and demonstrated
to the whole class that Laos is correct. 'What if everyone behaved
like you?' she said, witlessly sending me out. She wore a CND badge,
was a Labour Party member and had feminist stickers on her car. That
evening I asked my parents to send me to boarding school, which they did,
and where I respected the men who taught me. But that early experience
was an inoculation against anything smacking of 'PC' or 'progressive
liberalism'.
BEWARE THE LINGUISTIC THOUGHT POLICE. BIG SISTER AND
LITTLE BROTHER ARE WATCHING YOU!
Aidan Rankin