 |
 |
Dear Darren, > I believe spm99 has now fixed this issue so that the user does not have > to worry about whether they are entering a conjunction or not. So, if > you are looking at a conjunction and want an uncorrected p value simply > enter .001 (if you want that as your threshold), and spm99 figures out > how many comparisons are in the conjunction and adjusts it > accordingly. Thank you for making this clear. You are absolutely right - we have changed the threshold specification for uncorrected thresholds with conjunctions to make it the same at the corrected specification. The specified p value now pertains to the conjunction SPM not the component SPMs Again thank you - Karl %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%