Print

Print


                   Operational Research Society: 
                       Simulation Study Group
                        UK Simulation Society
                        Joint One Day Meeting

                Discrete Event Simulation and System 
                              Dynamics:
                     Never the Twain Shall Meet?
              Wednesday 12th April 2000, 9:30am-4:00pm
                    Executive MBA Teaching Centre
      Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, Coventry

When you want to build a simulation model how do you choose what 
kind of simulation approach to use? The choice between discrete event 
simulation and system dynamics may not be as straightforward as asking 
whether or not the real situation is discrete or continuous in nature. If 
you take a situation to be modelled, will a discrete event simulation 
expert automatically see the model as a discrete event simulation model 
and a system dynamics expert automatically see it as a system dynamics 
model? Or, alternatively, are there lessons to be learnt in how to choose 
which simulation method to use? The meeting will bring together 
presenters from both industry and academia to discuss their experiences 
using both discrete event simulation and system dynamics modelling.  
The day will finish with an informal discussion session where attendees 
will be encouraged to debate around issues that have arisen during the 
meeting. 

09:30-10:00	Coffee

10:00-10:20Introduction to the day
    Susan Howick (Strathclyde University)

10:20-11:10You Just Don’t Understand Me: Modes of Failure and 
    Success in the Discourse Between System Dynamics 
    and Discrete Event Simulation.
    David Lane (London School of Economics and 
    Political Science)

    This paper examines two established simulation 
    techniques; system dynamics (SD) and discrete event 
    simulation (DES). Brief familiarity with the two 
    approaches would lead one to expect there to be 
    strong and mutually supportive communication 
    between the respective camps. In reality, the discourse 
    between SD and DES seems fraught with hostility, 
    incomprehension and criticism. This paper suggests 
    that three modes of discourse may be determined.

    Mode 1 concentrates on the differences between the 
    two and supports the conclusion that the present 
    institutional divide between them should continue and 
    even be widened. Mode 2 concentrates on the 
    similarities and proposes that they can be seen as 
    aspects of essentially the same idea. 

    It is argued that these discourses are both failure 
    modes because they have a superficial grasp of the two 
    approaches. This is the case with Mode 1 because it 
    fails to acknowledge the undoubted connection 
    between them, from the broad level of modelling 
    aspirations down to some of the technical aspects of 
    validation. Mode 2 also fails but because it incorrectly 
    elides distinctive differences, for example, concerning 
    the decision problems that each approach is able to 
    treat.

    An account of the differences and similarities leads to 
    the proposal of Mode 3, in which a richer 
    understanding of SD and DES allows the two camps 
    both to grasp opportunities for making common cause 
    in areas of similarity, and to have an informed and 
    respectful understanding of the reasons why there are 
    areas of difference. Mode 3 is recommended as the 
    only long term success mode for discourse between SD 
    and DES.

11:10-11:40	Coffee

11:40-12:30Planes, Trains and Automobiles: A System Dynamics 
    Model of Large-Scale Military Operations with 
    Continuous and Discrete Elements
    Steve Curram (HVR Consulting Services)

    The presentation will look at a Powersim Constructor 
    system dynamics model of military operations for the 
    Canadian Department of National Defence that was 
    developed to investigate the potential impact of the 
    Millennium Bug on their effectiveness.  The features of 
    the problem situation meant that the choice of 
    modelling approach was not clear cut.  The 
    presentation will review the pros and cons of each 
    approach for the study and highlight the structures 
    that were used to implement discrete behaviour.  It will 
    conclude with lessons learned for future modelling.	
    					

12:30-14:00Lunch 

14:00-14:45	The Equivalence of Continuous and Discrete Simulation	
			Janet Lee, Pelham Barton and Andrew Tobias (Birmingham 
University)	

    Given their distinct heritages, it is perhaps 
    unsurprising that continuous and discrete  simulation 
    are treated somewhat separately in the literature and 
    that the majority of applications fall into just one of 
    these categories rather than two. The purpose of the 
    investigation reported here was to compare the 
    structure and performance of a given continuous 
    (system dynamics) model with that of a supposedly 
    equivalent discrete version. 

    To compare the methods, the Staff Recruitment and 
    Leaving (SRL) model of Wolstenholme (1990) was 
    chosen, for simplicity, as the starting point. The model 
    represents the movement of working staff in and out of 
    employment in a company where the recruitment rate is 
    determined at any instant by the shortfall in staff and 
    the leaving rate is proportional to the size of the 
    workforce. 

    It was implemented first in a simplified, system 
    dynamics form, employing only first order delays. 
    Changes in staffing level, number of people in training 
    and also average leaving rate were then calculated by 
    simulating from empty with one set of parameters. Two 
    equivalent models were then constructed - a discrete 
    event model and also a hybrid – so that profiles of the 
    output measures from the three models could be 
    compared. Some surprising results emerged. 

14:45-15:00	Tea

15:00-15:45Open Forum										
    Susan Howick (Strathclyde University)

15:45-16:00	Close

Booking a Place

To cover catering costs there is a £10 charge for this meeting.  Please 
reserve a place by sending a cheque (payable to the UK Simulation 
Society), giving your name and contact details, to:

Dr Stewart Robinson, Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, 
Coventry, CV4 7AL 

Directions to the meeting can be found at: 
{ HYPERLINK http://www.wbs.warwick.ac.uk/maps/ }http://www.wbs.warwick.ac.uk/maps/

The Executive MBA Teaching Centre is on the central campus between 
Radcliffe and Scarman House. (Note: since it is a new building it is not 
marked on the map.)
	
For further details please contact:
    Stewart Robinson (tel: 01203-522132, email: 
    [log in to unmask]) 
             		Simon Taylor (tel: 01895 203389, email: 
                     [log in to unmask])



Dr Stewart Robinson
Lecturer in Operational Research and Systems 
Warwick Business School
Warwick University
Coventry
CV4 7AL
UNITED KINGDOM

Tel: 44-(0)1203-522132
Fax: 44-(0)1203-524539
Email: [log in to unmask]
Home Page: http://users.wbs.warwick.ac.uk/ors/slrhome.htm


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%