 |
 |
Perhaps another "rule" should be that we treat all anonymous messages with the contempt they deserve. Anyone wishing to hide their true identity is either too mealy mouthed to run the risk of upsetting someone who might fund them, or is to unsure of their views to be worth listening to. If I want to say that Peter Briggs is a plonker, I will say so in public. Peter Briggs is a plonker. There. I said it. So, sue me Peter. Michael Kenward -----Original Message----- From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of BA Watcher Sent: 19 April 2000 15:09 To: [log in to unmask] Subject: RE: The Jenkin report is saying things that we all now believe in the right way at the right time >Monsieur Briggs wrote: >I am afraid that I don't usually have time to get involved in the psci-com debates and discussions... >I think that it is time that we discovered just how representative Andy's views, which seem to take up a lot of psci-com space at the moment, actually are. Hmmm. Perhaps Peter (when he has time) could draft some rules for psci-com, telling us: 1. How we ensure any views are "representative" before we send them. 2. What our weekly quota of psci-com space is. Until then - keep up the good work Andy. _______________________________________________________ Get 100% FREE Internet Access powered by Excite Visit http://freelane.excite.com/freeisp %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%