......why on earth a country, its people,
should want to have a King, a Queen, a Royal family?
 
(in a country ruled over by one person, you might be allowed to play " left" or "right"...
but the fact that you are conceptually subjected to a monarchy, symbolizing one man's privilege,
one man's sovereign, doesn't devoid you choices of any sense?
 
Shouldn't  the seeking of men's liberty through ideological doctrines
imply in the first place a denial of all monarchical privileges of the  Pharaoh ?
 
I find bizarre when I hear comments such as "...but the Queen is such a nice person, she
causes no harm to the nation."
 
Erminia
 
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: [log in to unmask]>William Fox
To: [log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask]
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2000 2:25 AM
Subject: Re: re de sade et al... and Fyodor

Oswald Mosley's version of Fascism in Britain was interesting. He left the Labour party in 1932 to form the British Union of Fascists (his plans for economic reform as a Labour minister were concise and sophisticated). Though his manifesto 'The Greater Britain' preached the essentials of a Fascist state - devotion to a visionary figurehead, devotion to the state - it was odd that he so desired to blend both Left and Right policies within his new party. The Left was represented in his grand plans for the abolition of massive unemployment numbers in Britain (as a result of the Great Depression), but at the same time he was one for expressing nostalgic, nationalist sentiment; identifying the heart of Britain in pastoral history, in green and pleasant fields.
 
Furthermore, and though we should keep in mind that the BUF never had huge membership figures, less emphasis was stressed on anti-semitism in Mosley's regime. This can be easily explained by the fact that the habitual, closed environment of British politics wouldn't accept a racist organisation. It's interesting to see that a politician, who, like Churchill and Lloyd George, wasn't educated at university, and whose name was bantered around as a potential PM, tested out Fascism in this less extreme sense. And, make no mistake, some of his economic plans were amazingly original. But his fate was sealed the moment his party claimed ownership of the best aspects of both Left and Right, especially under the banner of 'Fascism'.