 |
 |
As a one-time anthology editor, I have been following this thread with interest. In my view, the point about copyright is not that it is necessarily bad in itself but that copyright holders either abuse it or apply it inappropriately. The current public spat about John Clare copyrights would be a good example of this. Similarly, with regard to poetry most UK publishers seem happy to abide by the fair dealing guidelines - which are not legally binding - agreed between The Society of Authors and the Publishers' Association - all except Faber. They recently charged me 42 quid for quoting a few lines of Douglas Dunn in a paper in Textual Practice but it is widely accepted that it costs the average organisation at least 150 quid to raise and process an invoice so what was the point? Finally, when the Bloodaxe New Poetry was done and dusted, myself and my co-editors did seriously consider an anthology of international long poems in English. But the permissions killed it - from memory the project got to poem number 7 or 8 and the bill was already nine grand! And so interested readers are denied access to culture's closed shop... Cheers David %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%