Print

Print



Across a couple of threads....

I think the engines of industry have continued to turn
far more for Plath than Lowell. Letters/biographies
that wear the Plath label go instantly into the front ranks
of the press. Lowell's life ended in the back of a cab.
In many ways it stayed there. Id like to think his poems
continue to influence people.
I agree with Mairead that Plath was intensely interested
in things beyond herself/her pain. Although her measures
of the physical world were often metaphors for depression
and death, she could paint a landscape brilliantly.
I'm thinking of Mary Oliver as I write this, whose
celebrations of (often) rural landscapes and birds can be
quite amazing. Oliver's is a quiet, meditative voice
which can seem to work by osmosis. Plath's is wired,
in the stirrups of your ear. This is all over the place,
but so, this morning, am I. What was I saying?


best

Anthony


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%