 |
 |
Is the publication of this data (presumably containing personal identifying data) in line with the original reason for its collection? i.e. prosecution of offenders. Is the published data excessive in the form it takes? Ian Welton ----- Original Message ----- From: Chris Pounder <[log in to unmask]> To: <[log in to unmask]>; <[log in to unmask]> Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2000 3:03 PM Subject: RE: Another "Riddle"! > What Schedule 2 condition? > > Since its offences, What Schedule 3 condition > > C > > -----Original Message----- > From: MIME :[log in to unmask] > Sent: 15 June 2000 14:01 > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: Another "Riddle"! > > > A Trading Stds department publishes details of successful prosecutions on a > corporate web site . > > Issues which spring to mind are: > > Are there any dp implications about publishing as this data is in the public > domain anyway? > How long the info is displayed? > Should this be notified as disclosure outside Europe? > > > Comments pls > > > Edwina Withe > > > > ******************** E-mail confidentiality notice ******************** > > This message is intended for the addressee only. It is private, > confidential and may be covered by legal professional privilege or > other legal or attorney/client privilege. If you have received this > message in error, please notify us and remove it from your system. > > If you require assistance, please contact our London PC Support > department (telephone +44 (0) 20 7490 6949). > > Masons is an international law firm with offices in London, Bristol, > Edinburgh, Glasgow, Leeds, Manchester, Brussels, Dublin, Hong Kong, > Guangzhou and Singapore. > > Further information about the firm and a list of partners is > available for inspection at 30 Aylesbury Street, London EC1R OER > or from our Web site at www.masons.com > > *********************************************************************** > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%