 |
 |
> Here is a simple example in which I declare an array, DATA(-1:3). > When I pass > it to a subroutine, the indexes are changed to 1 to 5. Is this a bug in > the compiler or in the language specification? Using pointer can > preserve the range of the index. However, I am implementing a library > and I don't want to impose an extra burden on user to declare the data > using pointer whenever they use the library. Any other solutions? Use UBOUND and LBOUND to access the bounds (1:n) in the subroutine. > Your > comments and suggestions will be greatly appreciated. Thanks. > > Regards, > David Wong %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%